User talk:Sennen goroshi

You have new messages (last change).

[topic ban]

I do tend to delete messages when they are no longer relevant, so don't take offence if/when your message goes the way of the dodo

Re: Palin article..

In fact, I started by reverting you but I then searched for prior discussions about the subject and what I found seemed to back up your version. Since the matter is apparently not as trivial as I thought, I preferred letting the editors with more knowledge of the article deal with it and I undid my edit. Apologies for the confusion! (I still think having his name is not such a good idea, though) -- lucasbfr ^talk 15:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

I am in two minds, on principal he was did nothing to deserve media attention he just happened to be the father of the daughter of someone famous - but if I am realistic his name was fully disclosed in the media and there is unlikely to be any harm done by having his name in the article - personal details are not required but revealing his name is not going to do him any harm. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 00:28, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Seeking help in presenting thoughts clearly

I write to ask for prospective help. In a sense, I'm only interested laying the foundation for the future. Perhaps this may be construed as taking steps to avert problems might be mitigated by a timely comment or suggestion ...?

ArbCom remedy

Voting is underway at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Tang Dynasty/Proposed decision. In part because of "Evidence presented by Caspian blue", the locus of dispute was modified and "evidence in the case has expanded to include other disputes in which Tenmei has been involved." You will be surprised to learn that Sennen goroshi has anything at all to do with this so-called "evidence" at "Tenmei's wikihounding and trolling". I don't think this timeless prose is worth struggling to read, but I mention this to explain a bit more of the reasons why I'm reaching out to you specifically.

ArbCom findings of fact included:

• 3.2.2 Tenmei and dispute resolution. "... many of Tenmei's talkpage posts and submissions during this arbitration case have been very difficult for other editors to understand, to the point that experienced participants in dispute resolution have had difficulty in following them, despite what we accept as Tenmei's good-faith best efforts to assist us in resolving the case."

ArbCom remedies included:

• 3.3.2 Tenmei and dispute resolution: "Should Tenmei become involved in any further disputes with other editors, whether concerning the content of articles (beyond ordinary day-to-day editing issues) or more formal dispute resolution procedures, he shall seek the assistance of a volunteer mentor or adviser to work with him in maximizing the value of his presentation by assisting him with formulating it in a clear and civil fashion."

• 3.3.3 Editors advised: "Editors who encounter difficulties in communicating with others on-wiki are advised to seek help from others in presenting their thoughts clearly, particularly when disputes arise or when dispute resolution is sought."

It is clear that ArbCom anticipates future difficulties; and I guess I need to do the same. Arguably, my previous postings on your talk page are congruent with exactly the sort of thing ArbCom wants me to do in future; and I'm willing to invest in learning about how to disagree without being disagreeable.

If you want to discuss this off-wiki, I'm working on figuring out how to set up an appropriate e-mail address. -- Tenmei (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

FYI

Your ban has expired and I can delete the page if you wish.--Tznkai (talk) 16:18, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

AC Cobra?

70.171.235.197 (talk) 03:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)Yes it Is American, and NO, European cars aren't the best in the world (Unless you have $100,000 plus to spend on one.) Look around. See all those lawnmower -powered Fiats and Mini-Coopers and bubble cars and things? Those are the majority of European cars on the road. Most are illegal in the US due to safety concerns. American and Japanese are much better. For the Money, Japanese are the best. Look out your window before you write. And, Do not delete this unless you fear the truth.70.171.235.197 (talk) 03:30, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Fastest production car

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Fastest production car. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fastest production car (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on South Korea. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 14:02, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Yoon Bong-Gil

Hi! I didn't notice, but user Dekkappai pointed out that he was already categorized as Korean assassins. So I reverted my edit, removing the Korean murderer category. Hope you don't mind my self revert. Best regards. Oda Mari (talk) 18:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

editing Korean articles

Please note editing without valid sources or reference will result in reverting and it shows how unprofessional you are, don't be an idiot.--Korsentry 01:13, 4 April 2010 (UTC)