Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogivism: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:44, 18 January 2006

Blogivism

3 google hits, all from inside wikipedia. nn neologism, or at least that's what someone hopes it is. extreme quick delete. Timecop 00:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. neologism Incognito 00:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, bloggers make up new, meaningless words faster than they can punch them into Wikipedia. silsor 00:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wikipedia is not for something made up at school one day WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 00:10, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - made up word, per nom. -- Femmina 00:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Flapdragon 00:17, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Meaningless, made up word, not notable. Mike _{(T C)} 00:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per above. --Hosterweis 00:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism. I don't know how this qualifies for speedy deletion, though. Sycthos ^Talk 01:41, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. SWD316 ^{talk to m}^e 03:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Blnguyen 04:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. - Dharmabum420 06:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nominator. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable unverifiable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-18 09:11Z
Comment. I wonder if anyone uses the word Blogivism as they do blog since it does refer to blogging.. -- Eddie 10:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ter e nc e Ong 11:05, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Timecop. Sarah Ewart 11:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete neologism Hipocrite - «Talk» 14:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and maybe ... just maybe ... in a few years this will turn into a notable neologism. But I don't think so. When I think of "blog" I practically already think of activism or advocacy anyway. Cyde Weys 2M-VOTE 17:03, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above Lvialviaquez 17:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 19:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pointless blogcruft. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 21:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for fairly obvious reasons. Cptchipjew 22:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 *'''Delete''' as per nomination. [[User:Dustimagic|'''Dustimagic''']] *\o/* <sup>([[User talk:Dustimagic|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dustimagic|contribs]])</sup> *\o/* 19:27, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * '''Delete''' pointless blogcruft. [[User:JzG|Just zis <span style="border: 1px; border-style:solid">&nbsp;Guy,</span> you know?]] <sup>[[User_talk:JzG|[T]]]</sup>/<sub>[[Special:Contributions/JzG|[C]]]</sub> [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px|<nowiki></nowiki>]] ''[[User:JzG/AfD|AfD?]]'' 21:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Delete''' for fairly obvious reasons. [[User:Cptchipjew|Cptchipjew]] 22:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)