Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drork: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by accused parties </span>====== |
||
Wilkerson is unhappy with the fact I bring sources that refute his unacceptable edits, so he makes strange accusations against me. That's the best way to win a debate isn't it? Call security and ask them to expel your opponent from the room. I hope the gentlemen here will send Wilkerson to do some homework and be careful about his edits instead of trying to silence his opponents. [[User:HarQayam|HarQayam]] ([[User talk:HarQayam|talk]]) 22:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
<small><span style="font-weight:normal">''See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</span></small> |
|||
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%"> Comments by other users </span>====== |
||
Revision as of 22:05, 3 May 2010
Drork
- Drork (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Drork/Archive.
Report date May 3 2010, 10:01 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
- HarQayam (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Evidence submitted by Harlan wilkerson
Drork has been using sockpuppets to avoid an ARBCOM ban. HarQayam's account was created on 2 May 2010 and he immediately began posting at the British Mandate of Palestine article talk page repeating the same arguments in the style employed by Drork and his socks.
harlan (talk) 10:01, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Comments by accused parties
Wilkerson is unhappy with the fact I bring sources that refute his unacceptable edits, so he makes strange accusations against me. That's the best way to win a debate isn't it? Call security and ask them to expel your opponent from the room. I hope the gentlemen here will send Wilkerson to do some homework and be careful about his edits instead of trying to silence his opponents. HarQayam (talk) 22:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)