User talk:Man It's So Loud In Here

Philanthropy

I agree with you that it is absurd to use the title "philanthropy" at Jenna Elfman. Also, I think the messages addressed to you are inappropriate. However, it is true that all articles connected with Scientology are on "probation" (see WP:General sanctions). However, that just means that we must be particularly careful to be civil and not edit war. It would be a mistake to take the bait and react in an emotional manner with uncivil language. Just calmly discuss the issues. Johnuniq (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I am going to take a step back, and give in to the Scientology kabal that is obviously in effect here. I do think that a good strategy for that wacked-out cult to appear more mainstream would be to edit wikipedia articles to be "NPOV" and treat them like they are actually a religion. This is because a lot of people treat this site as their primary source for information. I honestly don't care enough to research wiki policy, I don't know or care who Arbcomm is. fuck it, I'll forget it and try to stay away from celebrity-scientologist pages for now. 128.223.130.150 (talk) 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC) oops, that was me, mislih 14:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

I posted a supportive comment above, so I want to record that I totally oppose your edit which added incivility to the talk page. Civility is fundamental to Wikipedia and you should consider striking your comment and issuing an apology. Johnuniq (talk) 00:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

It was pretty obviously a joke, so I don't think it's a big deal. mislih 15:33, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Ha, now he's wiki-stalking me trying to provoke me. I'm not the only immature one here. mislih 20:31, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

I replied to your comment on Gas. Katanada (talk) 18:36, 5 May 2010 (UTC)