Jump to content

De Natura Deorum: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
T of Locri (talk | contribs)
Details on dramatis personae.
T of Locri (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''De Natura Deorum''''' (''The Nature of the Gods'') is a philosophical dialogue by [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] orator [[Cicero]] written in 45 BC. It is laid out in three "books", each of which discuss the [[theology]] of different Roman and [[Greek philosophy|Greek philosophers]]. The dialogue concentrates on discussion of [[Stoicism|Stoic]] and [[Epicureanism|Epicurean]] theologies.
'''''De Natura Deorum''''' (''On the Nature of the Gods'') is a philosophical dialogue by [[Ancient Rome|Roman]] orator [[Cicero]] written in 45 BC. It is laid out in three "books", each of which discuss the [[theology]] of different Roman and [[Greek philosophy|Greek philosophers]]. The dialogue concentrates on discussion of [[Stoicism|Stoic]] and [[Epicureanism|Epicurean]] theologies.


The dialogue is on the whole narrated by Cicero himself, though he does not play an active part in the discussion. Gaius Velleius represents the Epicurean school, Quintius Lucilius Balbus argues for the Stoics, and Gaius Cotta speaks for Cicero's own Academic skepticism. The first book of the dialogue contains Cicero's introduction, Velleius' case for the Epicurean theology and Cotta's criticism of Epicureanism. Book II focuses on Balbus' explanation and defense of Stoic theology. Book III lays out Cotta's criticism of Balbus' claims.
The dialogue is on the whole narrated by Cicero himself, though he does not play an active part in the discussion. Gaius Velleius represents the Epicurean school, Quintius Lucilius Balbus argues for the Stoics, and Gaius Cotta speaks for Cicero's own Academic skepticism. The first book of the dialogue contains Cicero's introduction, Velleius' case for the Epicurean theology and Cotta's criticism of Epicureanism. Book II focuses on Balbus' explanation and defense of Stoic theology. Book III lays out Cotta's criticism of Balbus' claims.

Revision as of 09:17, 30 May 2010

De Natura Deorum (On the Nature of the Gods) is a philosophical dialogue by Roman orator Cicero written in 45 BC. It is laid out in three "books", each of which discuss the theology of different Roman and Greek philosophers. The dialogue concentrates on discussion of Stoic and Epicurean theologies.

The dialogue is on the whole narrated by Cicero himself, though he does not play an active part in the discussion. Gaius Velleius represents the Epicurean school, Quintius Lucilius Balbus argues for the Stoics, and Gaius Cotta speaks for Cicero's own Academic skepticism. The first book of the dialogue contains Cicero's introduction, Velleius' case for the Epicurean theology and Cotta's criticism of Epicureanism. Book II focuses on Balbus' explanation and defense of Stoic theology. Book III lays out Cotta's criticism of Balbus' claims.

The work's discussion of probability and chance has been traced as a source of the idea of the infinite monkey theorem, that out of a large set of random events, a seemingly great amount of order might be found.[citation needed]

This work, alongside De Officiis and De Divinatione was highly influential on the philosophes of the 18th century; Voltaire called it "(...) perhaps the best book of all antiquity".[1]

Quotes

  • The consequence of which is that there are many things probable; and although they are not subjects of actual perception to our senses, yet they have so grand and glorious an aspect that a wise man governs his life thereby. (To us, probability is the very guide of life) [Lat., Res enim nulla est, de qua tantopere non solum indocti, sed etiam docti dissentiant; quorum opiniones cum tam variae sint tamque inter se dissidentes, alterum fieri profecto potest, ut earum nulla, alterum certe non potest, ut plus una vera sit.(I, 5)
  • We, on the contrary, make blessedness of life depend upon an untroubled mind, and exemption from all duties. (We think a happy life consists in tranquility of mind). [Lat., Nos autem beatam vitam in animi securitate et in omnium vacatione munerum ponimus.] (I, 53)
  • Because all the sick do not recover, therefore medicine is not an art. [Lat., Ne aegri quidem quia non omnes convalescunt, idcirco ars nulla medicina est.] (II, 12)
  • Things perfected by nature are better than those finished by art. [Lat., Meliora sunt ea quae natura quam illa quae arte perfecta sunt.] (II, 87)
  • There never was a great man unless through divine inspiration.[2] [Lat., Nemo igitur vir magnus sine aliquo adflatu divino umquam fuit.] (II, 167)

Text

Latin text

References

  1. ^ Peter Gay, The Enlightenment - The Rise of Modern Paganism, W.W. Norton & Company, 1995, p. 109.
  2. ^ Ballou, Maturin Murray (1871). Treasury of thought. Forming an encyclopædia of quotations from ancient and modern authors. Boston: J.R. Osgood and Co. p. 216. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)