Jump to content

Talk:Fantastic Mr. Fox (film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Ronald: new section
Line 35: Line 35:


The box office numbers seen on this article need to be updated. The total grosses of this movie are as of now $41,026,048. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Andulias|Andulias]] ([[User talk:Andulias|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Andulias|contribs]]) 11:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The box office numbers seen on this article need to be updated. The total grosses of this movie are as of now $41,026,048. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Andulias|Andulias]] ([[User talk:Andulias|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Andulias|contribs]]) 11:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Ronald ==

It's Ronald, not "Roald".

Revision as of 15:20, 5 June 2010

WikiProject iconFilm: American C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Headlines

The Fantastic Mr. Fox is the last appearence of the 1994 20th Century Fox logo :-( --Henrytvwhiz (talk) 02:47, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plot section seems unprofessional

While I don't doubt that the plot as it is given on this page is accurate (I live in California), I was reading through it and it seems to be, in form, very different from other Wikipedia film article plot summaries. For example, character quotes are interspersed throughout the summary: Just like this except it's something you've never seen before in a Wikipedia article!. (talk) 07:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Specification

The plot needs to specify a key detail. Around the middle, it is said that Mr. Fox's house is in a tree. It then goes on to say that that said house goes under siege by the antagonists, and that the family escapes by digging. Given that the house is in a tree, it needs to be specified what exactly is happening here, to avoid confusion.— dαlus Contribs 07:15, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Nevermind, I misread and misunderstood what the original writer meant by in a tree. To this end, I have altered the text to make this more apparent.— dαlus Contribs 07:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you've seen the movie or not, but their house isn't under a tree. Their house is the inside of a tree and the dig through the floor to escape the farmers. AniMate 21:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't, and thank you so much for the clarification, I'll correct my mistake now, and clarify further that it isn't like a tree house.— dαlus Contribs 05:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you already fixed my error. Thanks.. but I still feel there should be a bit more clarification, however, I do not wish to go about that the way I had planned, as I don't think it would flow that well with the rest of the article. Do you know of a way we might do this?— dαlus Contribs 05:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Goof

The scientific names used in the movie are incorrectly formatted. "The genus name is always written with an initial capital letter. In current usage, the specific name is never written with an initial capital. For example, the entire tiger species is Panthera tigris" [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.156.65.58 (talk) 11:35, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Awards

Fantastic Mr. Fox became a Nominee for the 82nd Academy Awards: http://www.oscars.org/awards/academyawards/82/nominees.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colorgetic (talkcontribs) 19:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

I think it should be noted that the top critics at RT have given this film 100%, which is higher than UP's rating. Many other film articles note the Top Critics response in their reception section so it would not be out of the ordinary. Jack mcdowell (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office

The box office numbers seen on this article need to be updated. The total grosses of this movie are as of now $41,026,048. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andulias (talkcontribs) 11:22, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]