Talk:TVCatchup

This website is I believe one of a kind in the UK. It is also important as it is a current affair.

Would it be premature to change present tense to past tense in this article? 89.102.4.222 (talk) 12:08, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

I think it may be. Though I've heard a lot of discussion on forums saying that it's doubted they'll come back because BBC, ITV and Ch4 are already developing a similar 'all-in-one' service (called Kangeroo). I think it's best to just leave it as it is at the moment.. londonsista | ^Prod 14:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

I Believe the Kangaroo service (to be correctly named and promoted in late 2008) will either be subscription based or a pay per download service, similar to what the BBC is doing with apple iTunes. Wiki-kml (talk) 16:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

External link removed by Beetstra

TVCatchup's links to its Lawyers are an important part of this page and as such shouldn't be removed as it lends credibility to the service which has been fought over in court. Also TVCatchup is a non-profit organisation due to the nature of its service.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.154.199.200 (talk • contribs)

Sure, that is all fine, but please have a good look at our conflict of interest guideline and our business FAQ. I have now protected the article, seen there are already several socks here trying to own the article. Please discuss here. --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 16:57, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

{{editsemiprotected}}

There should be a protection notice template on the page. 76.117.247.55 (talk) 12:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

 Done - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

FunkyCanute

Having being a long time follower of TVCatchup and Zattoo watching internet TV grow, I find your edits incredible and without substance, it is widely known that TVCatchup withdrew its service and is also quoted in the notice following so I am slightly concerned as to true motives in editing this page?