User talk:User9933: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:: I am sorry if a company with with you are affiliated is getting what you think is bad rap from the federal govenrment (including a Federal suit by the Government for sexual harassment) and hags garnered over 500 BBB complaints. but putting up a puff piece on eh company and your wholesale blanking of several editors is not what we are on wikipedia for. |
:: I am sorry if a company with with you are affiliated is getting what you think is bad rap from the federal govenrment (including a Federal suit by the Government for sexual harassment) and hags garnered over 500 BBB complaints. but putting up a puff piece on eh company and your wholesale blanking of several editors is not what we are on wikipedia for. |
||
:: You can't simply remove reliably sourced information because it hurts your company.[[User:User9933|User9933]] ([[User talk:User9933#top|talk]]) 09:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC) |
:: You can't simply remove reliably sourced information because it hurts your company.[[User:User9933|User9933]] ([[User talk:User9933#top|talk]]) 09:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::Again, you're just flat-out wrong when you make assumptions about my having any affiliation with the company. [[Special:Contributions/24.4.101.72|24.4.101.72]] ([[User talk:24.4.101.72|talk]]) 09:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 09:27, 14 June 2010
June 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 24.4.101.72 (talk) 09:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
What are you talking about Anon? Are you new to wikipedia? I am citing Better Business Bureau numbers as well as note of sexual harassment charges by the federal government on the EOOC federal website. What could be more official?. Why do you keep blanking verifiable information?
- I removed nothing about a federal website. What I did remove were vague accusations with abosolutely no citations for verifiablity. You make a really bad assumption when you accuse me of being an employee of the company. A better question would be what is your connection to this company? A competitor, or a disgruntled customer perhaps? 24.4.101.72 (talk) 09:21, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- I am sorry if a company with with you are affiliated is getting what you think is bad rap from the federal govenrment (including a Federal suit by the Government for sexual harassment) and hags garnered over 500 BBB complaints. but putting up a puff piece on eh company and your wholesale blanking of several editors is not what we are on wikipedia for.
- You can't simply remove reliably sourced information because it hurts your company.User9933 (talk) 09:24, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Again, you're just flat-out wrong when you make assumptions about my having any affiliation with the company. 24.4.101.72 (talk) 09:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)