User talk:Theda: Difference between revisions
bitter lawyer |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:To address your last question first see [[WP:COI|Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]], just about everything that you need to know about a conflict of interest is addressed on that page. This is a good ref [http://www.forbes.com/2008/10/01/rick-eid-exlist-lead-dreamlife08-cx_re_1001eid.html] but it could use more. If you like, I will move it to your userspace. There you can refine it and recreate it when you feel ready, just let me know. If you would rather have a copy I can do that too. —[[User:Sandahl|Sandahl]] [[User talk:Sandahl|(♀) ]] 21:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC) |
:To address your last question first see [[WP:COI|Wikipedia:Conflict of interest]], just about everything that you need to know about a conflict of interest is addressed on that page. This is a good ref [http://www.forbes.com/2008/10/01/rick-eid-exlist-lead-dreamlife08-cx_re_1001eid.html] but it could use more. If you like, I will move it to your userspace. There you can refine it and recreate it when you feel ready, just let me know. If you would rather have a copy I can do that too. —[[User:Sandahl|Sandahl]] [[User talk:Sandahl|(♀) ]] 21:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
::Sure thing, move it to my userspace. And yeah, I read the CoI stuff, I don't think there will be a problem, but disclosure is always a good idea.[[User:Nycbl1y|Nycbl1y]] ([[User talk:Nycbl1y|talk]]) 14:21, 14 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:21, 14 June 2010
![Photograph](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bd/Archives.png/90px-Archives.png)
I see you recently reverted an edit to the article. Not to own articles, but I reverted back, since there was a source. Oh well, GTTR. OpenTheWindows, sir! 20:50, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- I reverted a removal of sources, it looks like you reverted back to the same edit that removed said sources [1].—Sandahl (♀) 21:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Bitter Lawyer
I want to take another stab at adding a page for BitterLawyer.com. If I recall, the problem last time was establishing noteworthiness. The site won the 2009 ABA Journal Blawg 100 Lighter Fare category (http://www.abajournal.com/blawg100/2009/lighter), they've had interviews with some fairly big name people such as Texas Tech coach Mike Leach and author of Prozac Nation Elizabeth Wurtzel (http://www.bitterlawyer.com/index.php/interviews_recent/), and then there's this article from Forbes about the site, or more specifically, about the webshow on the site. (http://www.forbes.com/2008/10/01/rick-eid-exlist-lead-dreamlife08-cx_re_1001eid.html). Is this good enough to move forward with?
Also, just want to disclose I have a conflict of interest here.Nycbl1y (talk) 19:11, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- To address your last question first see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, just about everything that you need to know about a conflict of interest is addressed on that page. This is a good ref [2] but it could use more. If you like, I will move it to your userspace. There you can refine it and recreate it when you feel ready, just let me know. If you would rather have a copy I can do that too. —Sandahl (♀) 21:47, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
- Sure thing, move it to my userspace. And yeah, I read the CoI stuff, I don't think there will be a problem, but disclosure is always a good idea.Nycbl1y (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2010 (UTC)