Jump to content

User talk:AmericaIsNumberOne: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Blocked again: new section
No edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:


I have blocked you again, this time for a full month. It is clear that you are only going to edit without discussion here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dakota_Fanning&diff=369340744&oldid=369340533 This revert] shows this clearly. However, if you look at [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0266824/awards this list of her awards], you'll see that Pippo is correct. You need to understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. You need to talk about your edits. You cannot just keep pressing the undo blindly and not explaining why you do what you do. When your block expires, please make a better effort to discuss your edits. Thank you, [[User:Either way|either way]] ([[User talk:Either way#top|talk]]) 03:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
I have blocked you again, this time for a full month. It is clear that you are only going to edit without discussion here. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dakota_Fanning&diff=369340744&oldid=369340533 This revert] shows this clearly. However, if you look at [http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0266824/awards this list of her awards], you'll see that Pippo is correct. You need to understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. You need to talk about your edits. You cannot just keep pressing the undo blindly and not explaining why you do what you do. When your block expires, please make a better effort to discuss your edits. Thank you, [[User:Either way|either way]] ([[User talk:Either way#top|talk]]) 03:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I did not know

Revision as of 21:15, 22 June 2010

Per the above SPI, SocalBill09 (talk · contribs), AmericaIsNumberOne (talk · contribs) and Montana's Defender (talk · contribs) are confirmed to be the same person. In lieu of an indefinite block on all three accounts, I'm requiring you to pick one account and stick with it. To ensure compliance, the other two accounts will be blocked indefinitely. Further, you must clearly disclose the link between the three accounts, by, for instance, redirecting the other two accounts' user page/talk pages. Pending receipt of a response, I'm blocking all three accounts indefinitely. Once you have made a decision as to what account you will continue to use, you can use {{unblock|reason}} on that account's talk page. Tim Song (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I picked AmericaIsNumberOne i only changed because i don't like people watching every edit i make bad or good.}}

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

This account is unblocked. Please make sure the other two accounts are visibly linked to this one and stick to this account from now on.

Request handled by: Tim Song (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Having your editing history open to all is a part of the open, free, shared nature of this project. If you want to be here, you just have to deal with it. That said, if someone in particular is singling you out using your edit history, you there are guidelines to help you deal with Wikistalking. --WikidSmaht (talk) 11:05, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

I have blocked you again, this time for a full month. It is clear that you are only going to edit without discussion here. This revert shows this clearly. However, if you look at this list of her awards, you'll see that Pippo is correct. You need to understand that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. You need to talk about your edits. You cannot just keep pressing the undo blindly and not explaining why you do what you do. When your block expires, please make a better effort to discuss your edits. Thank you, either way (talk) 03:13, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know