Talk:Smut (fungus): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:28, 29 June 2010

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Fungi Stub‑class High‑importance

	Fungi portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fungi, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fungi on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FungiWikipedia:WikiProject FungiTemplate:WikiProject FungiFungi articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Consider making this a disambig. page for obvious reasons. --68.146.74.91 18:57, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Was probably my mistake, but the eastern seaboard of Aus isn't the most productive area for sugarcane, brazil is. i'll make the change (just the wording of it) unless anyone has a prob with it. --Brynic 03:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC) The Australian Eastern Seaboard isnt even one of the worlds most productive areas, it is one of the most productive areas of Australia... not the world. Good edit.[reply]

Revision as of 03:04, 31 January 2008 edit Traveler100 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 54,334 edits refined reqphoto using AWB ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:28, 29 June 2010 edit undo 203.39.51.116 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Was probably my mistake, but the eastern seaboard of Aus isn't the most productive area for sugarcane, brazil is. i'll make the change (just the wording of it) unless anyone has a prob with it. --[[User:Brynic\|Brynic]] 03:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)		Was probably my mistake, but the eastern seaboard of Aus isn't the most productive area for sugarcane, brazil is. i'll make the change (just the wording of it) unless anyone has a prob with it. --[[User:Brynic\|Brynic]] 03:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
			The Australian Eastern Seaboard isnt even one of the worlds most productive areas, it is one of the most productive areas of Australia... not the world. Good edit.