Talk:Smut (fungus): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Traveler100 (talk | contribs) refined reqphoto using AWB |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Was probably my mistake, but the eastern seaboard of Aus isn't the most productive area for sugarcane, brazil is. i'll make the change (just the wording of it) unless anyone has a prob with it. --[[User:Brynic|Brynic]] 03:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC) |
Was probably my mistake, but the eastern seaboard of Aus isn't the most productive area for sugarcane, brazil is. i'll make the change (just the wording of it) unless anyone has a prob with it. --[[User:Brynic|Brynic]] 03:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC) |
||
The Australian Eastern Seaboard isnt even one of the worlds most productive areas, it is one of the most productive areas of Australia... not the world. Good edit. |
Revision as of 00:28, 29 June 2010
Please add
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Fungi Stub‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Consider making this a disambig. page for obvious reasons. --68.146.74.91 18:57, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
Was probably my mistake, but the eastern seaboard of Aus isn't the most productive area for sugarcane, brazil is. i'll make the change (just the wording of it) unless anyone has a prob with it. --Brynic 03:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC) The Australian Eastern Seaboard isnt even one of the worlds most productive areas, it is one of the most productive areas of Australia... not the world. Good edit.