Talk:Hypovolemia: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:18, 29 June 2010

Medicine Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

even the possibility of internal bleeding in children should always be treated aggressively.

We're making normative statements now? -- 66.32.101.117 23:47, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I've seen this referred to as 'hypohemia', with 12,000 google matches to back this up (though meager compared to hypovolemia's 435,000). Perhaps I should create a redirect to this page under that name. Any thoughts? -Etafly 06:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I find this article difficult to read because it has too much medical jargon which I would argue is unneeded. Added cleanup-jargon template to the top of the page. --Epochwolf (talk) 03:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the sentence " When in doubt, treat hypovolemia aggressively" as there is a wealth of research saying that aggressive treatment of hypovolemia aimed at restoring pre-insult blood pressures can be very damaging^[1]. Permissive Hypotension is generally advised. I do agree that blood loos should pobviously be aggressively managed but this sentence was unclear. Tannim101 (talk) 22:01, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Diagnosis section is written too much like an instruction manual. I don't think the average reader will be tempted to treat the illness if they see the symptoms; I would hope they'd call for more professional help. Mavrisa (talk) 21:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://www.trauma.org/archive/resus/permissivehypotension.html

[1] ttp://www.trauma.org/archive/resus/permissivehypotension.html

[1]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 I have removed the sentence " When in doubt, treat hypovolemia aggressively" as there is a wealth of research saying that aggressive treatment of hypovolemia aimed at restoring pre-insult blood pressures can be very damaging<ref>http://www.trauma.org/archive/resus/permissivehypotension.html</ref>. Permissive Hypotension is generally advised.  I do agree that blood loos should pobviously be aggressively managed but this sentence was unclear.
 [[User:Tannim101|Tannim101]] ([[User talk:Tannim101|talk]]) 22:01, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
+The Diagnosis section is written too much like an instruction manual. I don't think the average reader will be tempted to treat the illness if they see the symptoms; I would hope they'd call for more professional help. [[User:Mavrisa|Mavrisa]] ([[User talk:Mavrisa|talk]]) 21:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)