Talk:The Gospel of Wealth: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:21, 14 July 2010

a chair is still a chair even if theres no one sitting there What in almighty name is this, and how does it relate to the Carnegie philosophy??

"Carnegie on Cuba" lacks any sort of context

This section appears to consist of quotes by Andrew Carnegie, but does not say so, nor does it provide any context for them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.144.56.215 (talk) 00:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.138.146.166 (talk) 20:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assertion of mischaracterization

Heading added by —Notyourbroom (talk) 21:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article is completely untrue. The Gospel of Wealth stated that it was a character flaw if you were poor^{[citation needed]}.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.8.243 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If that is true, please provide the quotation(s) from the piece that make that assertion. Thanks. —Notyourbroom (talk) 21:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 ==Assertion of mischaracterization==
 <small>Heading added by &mdash;[[User:Notyourbroom|Notyourbroom]] ([[User talk:Notyourbroom|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 21:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)</small><br/>
-This article is completely untrue. The Gospel of Wealth stated that it was a character flaw if you were poor.{{unsigned2|21:04, 25 April 2010|70.31.8.243}}
+This article is completely untrue. The Gospel of Wealth stated that it was a character flaw if you were poor{{Citation needed|date=July 2010}}.{{unsigned2|21:04, 25 April 2010|70.31.8.243}}
 :If that is true, please provide the quotation(s) from the piece that make that assertion. Thanks. &mdash;[[User:Notyourbroom|Notyourbroom]] ([[User talk:Notyourbroom|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 21:08, 25 April 2010 (UTC)