Talk:ECPAT: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Reads like an advertisment: new section |
→Is this?: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
With sentences like "ECPAT widened its scope of work to encompass all issues of child sexual exploitation" and "1) working with the private sector to adopt and implement the Code of Conduct for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation in Travel and Tourism" it looks like it was stolen directly from a the press centre of the organisation. At least the ECPAT-USA section needs to be rewritten. [[user:Jeltz|Jeltz]] [[user talk:Jeltz|<small>talk</small>]] 20:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC) |
With sentences like "ECPAT widened its scope of work to encompass all issues of child sexual exploitation" and "1) working with the private sector to adopt and implement the Code of Conduct for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation in Travel and Tourism" it looks like it was stolen directly from a the press centre of the organisation. At least the ECPAT-USA section needs to be rewritten. [[user:Jeltz|Jeltz]] [[user talk:Jeltz|<small>talk</small>]] 20:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
== Is this? == |
|||
Are ECPAT the guys who are backing that nonsensical law against fictional Child-pornography in Sweden? |
Revision as of 19:23, 26 July 2010
![]() | Organizations Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Reads like an advertisment
With sentences like "ECPAT widened its scope of work to encompass all issues of child sexual exploitation" and "1) working with the private sector to adopt and implement the Code of Conduct for the Protection of Children from Sexual Exploitation in Travel and Tourism" it looks like it was stolen directly from a the press centre of the organisation. At least the ECPAT-USA section needs to be rewritten. Jeltz talk 20:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Is this?
Are ECPAT the guys who are backing that nonsensical law against fictional Child-pornography in Sweden?