Revision as of 19:20, 30 July 2010

Errors on the list

I noticed Teak is mentioned twice on the list. Once with 1000 janka and once with 1150 janka. Both numbers are sourced (the two top sources each state a different number for teak) but only one can be correct. Can anyone clarify?--Nwinther (talk) 09:13, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with larch at 590 and 1200. Perhaps someone should add a column for the correct botanical names instead of the common names. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.60.239.35 (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It would also be a lot easier to read the list if it was sorted alphabetically. Is there a way to do this by script or does it have to be done manually? Svart0 (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Surely African Blackwood (listed as Blackwood) with it's density must have a much higher rating? All over the internet it's rated as 1720 but yet is denser than Lignum??

Revision as of 09:51, 22 January 2010 edit Svart0 (talk \| contribs) 25 edits →‎Errors on the list ← Previous edit		Revision as of 19:20, 30 July 2010 edit undo 165.146.54.16 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	It would also be a lot easier to read the list if it was sorted alphabetically. Is there a way to do this by script or does it have to be done manually? [[User:Svart0\|Svart0]] ([[User talk:Svart0\|talk]]) 09:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)		It would also be a lot easier to read the list if it was sorted alphabetically. Is there a way to do this by script or does it have to be done manually? [[User:Svart0\|Svart0]] ([[User talk:Svart0\|talk]]) 09:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

			Surely African Blackwood (listed as Blackwood) with it's density must have a much higher rating? All over the internet it's rated as 1720 but yet is denser than Lignum??