User talk:Wtshymanski: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Sorry you see my latest message as "repetition". It clarified that you missed the dB in the formula, which sheds a different light on the reasoning. Also, it specified what the other editors found objectionable as "nonstandard", namely x dB = 10^{x/10}, which as you said is high school algebra. These two things are new observations. I hope that you reconsider, and grant me the courtesy of an informative reply. [[User:Boute|Boute]] ([[User talk:Boute|talk]]) 19:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC) |
Sorry you see my latest message as "repetition". It clarified that you missed the dB in the formula, which sheds a different light on the reasoning. Also, it specified what the other editors found objectionable as "nonstandard", namely x dB = 10^{x/10}, which as you said is high school algebra. These two things are new observations. I hope that you reconsider, and grant me the courtesy of an informative reply. [[User:Boute|Boute]] ([[User talk:Boute|talk]]) 19:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
::I'd personally recommend ignoring Wtshymanski. Give them the same treatment they find so acceptable to give to others: crap. Seek outside opinions from civil editors if you actually want the dignity of being responded to. This person is more concerned with keeping the page blank. - '''[[User:Floydian|<font color="#5A5AC5">ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ</font>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Floydian|<font color="#3AAA3A">τ</font>]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Floydian|<font color="#3AAA3A">¢</font>]]</sub> 20:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:38, 5 August 2010
If only it would stay blank.
Sorry you see my latest message as "repetition". It clarified that you missed the dB in the formula, which sheds a different light on the reasoning. Also, it specified what the other editors found objectionable as "nonstandard", namely x dB = 10^{x/10}, which as you said is high school algebra. These two things are new observations. I hope that you reconsider, and grant me the courtesy of an informative reply. Boute (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'd personally recommend ignoring Wtshymanski. Give them the same treatment they find so acceptable to give to others: crap. Seek outside opinions from civil editors if you actually want the dignity of being responded to. This person is more concerned with keeping the page blank. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 20:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)