Jump to content

User talk:Theblog: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Erwin85Bot (talk | contribs)
Kallimina (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:


Just stopping by to say hi. [[User:Kallimina|Kallimina]] ([[User talk:Kallimina|talk]]) 17:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Just stopping by to say hi. [[User:Kallimina|Kallimina]] ([[User talk:Kallimina|talk]]) 17:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
: Hey! Stopping in to say hello again. How have you been? [[User:Kallimina|Kallimina]] ([[User talk:Kallimina|talk]]) 16:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


== A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies ==
== A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies ==

Revision as of 16:24, 10 August 2010

Am I the only one who can't make heads or tails about WP:N? Everyone seems to know what's going on, and I'm sitting in the dark trying to understand how some of these people are even getting to their conclusions. Kallimina (talk) 04:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can this be used as a source?

http://www.kepl.com.au/esstu/rosmud.html

RosMud was developed for Threshold RPG, but it can be used for many games. I'm not sure how to cite a page or if it's even acceptable.

If you take a look at JediMUD, you can see it has a section on how to connect. Kallimina (talk) 19:38, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Just stopping by to say hi. Kallimina (talk) 17:29, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Stopping in to say hello again. How have you been? Kallimina (talk) 16:24, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change (survey described here). If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 21:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]