Talk:Midnight Commander: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:38, 13 August 2010

Computing: Software Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Computing Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Which Version?

Midnight Commander seems to have become a terrible mess by 2006. It seems to have thousands of reported bugs, and lack serious ongoing maintenance. There are so many forks and versions it is impossible for casual user to know which one to try. The main article needs a serious version history/discussion, highlighting recommendations from someone knowledgeable about the best stable current version.

One easy-access path is gnu mc 4.6.1-pre4 included in Knoppix 4.0.2CD (Utilities>Tools>mc).

What is the best easiest most stable simple version for Windows users to try? 69.87.193.48 23:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's not good, but it's not that bad. It might be worth mentioning mc snapshots in the article. It's not vigorously maintained, but it's not dead. And, regarding the forks, those are basically dead. The only real mc is at ibiblio. And, as most (all?) distros come with it already, it's easy enough to get. True, though, this isn't going to be a featured article any time soon.

(Oh, and as far as Windows, I don't know of a version other than the one you get with cygwin.) 216.77.227.14 07:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Directory Sizes

4.6.1 does have a "show directory sIzes" command (in the Command pull-down menu). Not convenient, no short-cut available, doesn't seem to be any way to map one either. No mode availble to turn on the display of directory sizes. And when you ask for the sizes of something big, it seems to lock up the computer while it does the calculation! 69.87.193.48 23:48, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccuracy

I'm deleting 'mcedit is a separate executable, which can also be used independently of Midnight Commander'.

:file `which mcedit`
/usr/bin/mcedit: symbolic link to `mc'

:file -L `which mcedit`
/usr/bin/mcedit: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), \
for GNU/Linux 2.4.1, dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.4.1, stripped

Also read the man page. There is a 'cooledit' which is supposedly the original codebase for the mcedit code of mc, but mcedit is builtin. 216.77.227.14 07:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Color Screenshot?

Or at least mc in a white-on-black terminal. But really, you almost never see it without color. 216.77.227.14 07:48, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Following up on my own earlier observation: you also never see it with a brown color. When I mentioned the b&w issue, the screenshot was changed to a default one but now it's been changed again to this brown one. Could all screenshots of all applications use their vanilla configuration as a representative portrayal? 74.162.149.181 (talk) 17:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Graphical program of the same name?

I remember before Nautilus existed, there was a program for GNOME called GNU Midnight Commander which was a graphical file manager, seemingly unrelated to the curses application. Some other articles, like the one for Nautilus, mention this, linking here. But I don't see it in this article. 174.21.17.91 (talk) 16:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

History and versions

The article does not have any information when did MC project started and when was first version released and when 1.0 version got released. Who started to develop it and it would be nice to have screenshots from the first versions as well. Now the article is more like a marketing trick than article in a enclycopedia. Golftheman (talk) 17:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 I remember before [[Nautilus (file manager)|Nautilus]] existed, there was a program for GNOME called GNU Midnight Commander which was a graphical file manager, seemingly unrelated to the curses application.  Some other articles, like the one for Nautilus, mention this, linking here.  But I don't see it in this article.  [[Special:Contributions/174.21.17.91|174.21.17.91]] ([[User talk:174.21.17.91|talk]]) 16:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
+== History and versions ==
+The article does not have any information when did MC project started and when was first version released and when 1.0 version got released. Who started to develop it and it would be nice to have screenshots from the first versions as well. Now the article is more like a marketing trick than article in a enclycopedia. [[User:Golftheman|Golftheman]] ([[User talk:Golftheman|talk]]) 17:38, 13 August 2010 (UTC)