Talk:Nominal Pipe Size: Difference between revisions
→polyethylene tubing: new section |
|||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
<span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/202.89.38.105|202.89.38.105]] ([[User talk:202.89.38.105|talk]]) 04:00, 14 October 2009 |
<span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/202.89.38.105|202.89.38.105]] ([[User talk:202.89.38.105|talk]]) 04:00, 14 October 2009 |
||
(UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
(UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== polyethylene tubing == |
|||
What are the actual OD, ID, and wall dimensions of common 0.5 to 2-inch black plastic "Poly Pipe" polyethylene tubing in the US? In other countries? -[[Special:Contributions/96.237.78.13|96.237.78.13]] ([[User talk:96.237.78.13|talk]]) 00:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:43, 18 August 2010
Thank you contributors!
I am really surprised to see this entry. Good work. Excellent effort.
THIS IS VERY HELPFULLYItalicTHANKS FOR YOU SUPPORT text'
Very Useful information. I had been looking for this information for months. Now that I have this info, life becomes so much easier.. Very good work, thank you... Kindly arrange the table converter from NPS to DN —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.30.137 (talk) 07:27, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Lamp pipe (nipple) threads: 1/8-IP, 1/4-IP
Lamps and light fixtures here in the U.S. use standard pipe nipples of size "1/8-IP". I googled "1/8-IP" and found that these are nicely explained at [1], which says that they come from a 19th-century standard for wrought iron pipe by a company called Briggs. Their cited source is "Standard Pipe and Pipe Threads." Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, volume 8, Page 29. I suspect that maybe this IP standard evolved into NPS, but I do not know that as fact. It would be great if someone who works in engineering related to pipe could work this info into this article or whichever other article would be logical. I won't have time to read and research into this, but maybe someone who is already well versed in this field can contribute the info to Wikipedia without too much time expenditure. — ¾-10 16:37, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the article already mentions iron pipe size, which seems to be what you're talking about.--Yannick (talk) 01:27, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, OK, upon rereading iron pipe size, I find that it is probably referring to one and the same thing. Thanks. One thing I don't get. According to American Machinists' Handbook, 2nd ed, pp 42-43, the Briggs threads are actually taper threads, for sealed joints; but yet they are used in lamps and light fixtures today as a non-taper thread. (You can buy nipples in any length, from ½" to 12", with all threads perfect, i.e., full and not tapering). I guess there is nothing to "get"—it is what it is—but I am surprised that they effectively took a taper thread standard and morphed it into what is essentially a machine screw thread standard. And the major diameter is .375, rather than .405. Essentially it is a little ⅜-27 machine screw thread, standard to nothing but lamps and light fixtures. I wanted to just buy some cap screws with this thread, but now I see why my light fixture was made stupidly to begin with: you can't buy them. It looks like I may have to make them the ole-fashioned way, with the quick-change gear-box set to 27 and a blank turned to .375. I didn't expect to have to do this simple job from scratch. I am a little miffed that we are still bound to this size in 2007. I vote for abolishing it tomorrow. To hell with maintaining backwards compatibility with any legacy light fixtures; let the antiquarians turn custom threads when they need them—I want mine in a box from McMaster-Carr! Oh well, it is late and I will stop ranting! — ¾-10 03:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
- Hmmm. There's a straight (non-tapered) version of the NPT called NPSM that's used for hoses and mechanical joints. But that .375 diameter doesn't sound right. I agree with abolishing legacy threads; let's just settle on M10 for light fixtures... (I'm well aware that would not be popular in the Western hemisphere.)--Yannick (talk) 04:41, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
What is the thread called on a (U.S.) standard shower riser with OD of 5/8" (.625)
This is the pipe that your shower head screws onto. The OD is 5/8" (.625). What is the name of this thread? I can't figure out this pipe size and pipe thread standard BS. Any help out there? — ¾-10 18:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
The typical size for a shower pipe in the US is 1/2" NPT. An exception is the Price Pfeister brand showerhead nipple that has a kind of ball and socket joint near the head, but goes into the wall with 1/2" NPT WonderWheeler (talk) 06:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
XH, XXH
I would like to see a brief paragraph added regarding extra heavy and double extra heavy along the same lines as XS and XXS, perhaps following the first paragraphy under History. I think this would be particularly helpful for anyone perusing a pipe table who is trying to make sense of it all. I've seen a number of vendor sites that explain this already. I'll add it to my to-do list, but anyone else who agrees is free to take a shot at it.--CheMechanical (talk) 21:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
Amendment: I've been looking at so many Wiki pages, I overlooked the fact that I there is already something on XH and XXH in the History section. (I searched the page using only the abbreviations before I posted, but they are spelled out instead. I think I might remedy this.) I would like to amend my request to perhaps have someone research the history of these terms rather than just leaving a reference to these being alternate terminology. I think it might be important to point out that the terms were intended to be superseded by a newer system but have managed to hang on just like XS and XXS.--CheMechanical (talk) 22:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
STD, XS, and XXS; Electrical; Copper
STD, XS, and XXS: these abbreviations are used by structural engineers as they are listed in their reference books for common steel shapes. At least by my experience in the US. Structural engineers prefer steel columns and the like described by call-outs based on dimensions rather than what the bursting strength of it would be if used as a pressure pipe only.
Electrical: We might also mention that the NPS standards is also used in electrical fittings in the US in PVC and regular steel electrical conduit (not EMT etc). Except, that the threads on fittings and conduit are not tapered (possible exception of full lengths of standard steel conduit). This lack of tapering allows the use of bushings, locknuts et cetera, although they are not water tight. The PVC fittings are typically glued, although male and female threaded adapters are made. This is similar to the 1/8" and 1/4" nipples (previously discussed) that grew out of the use of gas fittings for lights, and even the term keyed and keyless lights and lampholders that grew out of the use of gas luminaires.
Perhaps someone should also edit the article to mention that these nominal pipe sizes are based on the use of steel pipe, and they were extended to brass and PVC pipe, but do not hold true for copper! Copper pipe in the US at least, comes in different thickesses, and the outside diameter is based on the nominal size plus 1/8". That is, 1/2" copper plumbing pipe (not refrigeration tubing) is exactly 5/8" outside diameter.
There is also standard for PVC pipe below schedule 40, for irrigation use called PS125 or something like that. Outside diameter matches NPS.
CPVC and PEX pipe (and the old PB pipe) do not match NPS, but use different standards WonderWheeler (talk) 06:08, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
NPS 3/4" and 1" seem to be missing from the tables
Subject line says it all.
Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.42.86.250 (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
In New Zealand there is some usage of "SN ratings". I found one source which indicates an "SN rating" is the same as a "schedule number" - can anybody confirm this?
Hmmm - a local source equates the SN number with the Load to achieve 5% deflection (kn/m/m)...
Ah - our SN numbers are defined by AS/NZS 5065 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.89.38.105 (talk) 04:00, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
polyethylene tubing
What are the actual OD, ID, and wall dimensions of common 0.5 to 2-inch black plastic "Poly Pipe" polyethylene tubing in the US? In other countries? -96.237.78.13 (talk) 00:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)