User talk:Guinea pig warrior: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Maggies1870 - "" |
Maggies1870 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
== Thank you == |
== Thank you == |
||
Youre not being bullied, your POV is being contradicted with referenced material. There's a difference. |
|||
Youre not being bullied, youre being contradicted. There's a difference, if you cant work it out then you need to seek psychological help. At least certain pages will now be more factual. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Maggies1870|Maggies1870]] ([[User talk:Maggies1870|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Maggies1870|contribs]]) 13:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Revision as of 03:05, 21 August 2010
Goodbye Messages
Please leave a goodbye message
I hope you reconsider
I genuinely hope you don't retire as you obviously make some very good and well informed edits.
My only problem with your edits is, even if an edit is backed up by fact, if you don't approve, it goes.
An example using AFL (video game series).
I made this series of changes to the AFL game page on the 11th Aug, backed up by a comment on the discussion page here.
Your reaction to the change. Revert. I hope you'll agree, nothing I changed can be disputed as factually incorrect? I even provided 2 other games (2 of the biggest of the 1990's while we were disputing a game made in the 90's) as reference to the way I changed it.
Again, I hope you reconsider.
Sequal1 (talk) 23:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
- I tried mate, I really think you add a lot to Wikipedia and a lot of pages will be worse off without your input. I meant what I said here and was hoping we could move on from this. Sequal1 (talk) 12:59, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Goodbye Guinea!
I hope you find the time and patience to come back in the future at some point. You were the only other editor even remotely interested in some of the articles I was editing and without your help they might just stagnate. Hit me up by email or something in the future if you like!--Senor Freebie (talk) 03:00, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Cya
I'm genuinely sorry about you decision. We need all the editors we can get at WP:AFL, even if you and I disagreed occasionally. Jenks24 (talk) 06:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
My Condolences...
As I say to every editor who dramatically announces their "swan song" - you have to evolve and improve. "Bullies" bothering you? Learn how to deal with them. Embarrassed by some of your edits and/or edit summaries: I've got a million I'd love to retract of my own. Been wrong? No shame in that at all - but you've got to be able to quickly learn common sense in editing with all others. I've very little sympathy for truly valuable editors who "quit" out of pressure from others. If you want to positively contribute here to building an encyclopedia - the choice is yours, and all your good edits will be recognized (as well as your bad ones). Best of luck, and hopefully you'll "see the light". Cheers... Doc9871 (talk) 08:26, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
I hope you would reconsider
I've seen you around the various video game articles, and it looks like you have done a fine job from what I've seen. I don't know exactly what is going on, perhaps you're just burned out or something, and you should take a little time off to gather your thoughts and your mind; that may also help with that inferiority complex of yours. The fact of the matter is that we need your help, especially with the rather poor state, as you well know, these video game and football articles are in. If you want to talk about what's going on, feel free to email me. Take good care of yourself, and hopefully you return soon. –MuZemike 14:57, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Youre not being bullied, your POV is being contradicted with referenced material. There's a difference.