Source evaluation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 146.230.128.27 (talk) to last version by Blehfu |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*Audio-visual sources: Tv-programs, Documentary movies. |
*Audio-visual sources: Tv-programs, Documentary movies. |
||
==Criteria for evaluating information== |
|||
The following criteria for source evaluation is taken from the American Library Association (1994) and Engeldinger (1988): |
|||
#How was the source located? |
|||
#What type of source is it? |
|||
#Who is the author and what are the qualifications of the author in regard to the topic that is discussed? |
|||
#When was the information published? |
|||
#In which country was it published? |
|||
#What is the reputation of the publisher? |
|||
#Does the source show a particular cultural or political bias? |
|||
For literary sources we might add complementing criteria: |
|||
#Does the source contain a bibliography? |
|||
#Has the material been reviewed by a group of peers, or has it been edited? |
|||
#How does the article/book compare with similar articles/books? |
|||
==References== |
==References== |
||
Revision as of 23:05, 25 August 2010
 | It has been suggested that this article be merged into Source criticism. (Discuss) Proposed since March 2009. |
Source evaluation is the skill of analysing information sources in order to assess their credibility. The ability to assess different sources of information is highly relevant to the task of operating within a complex information society. Engeldinger (1998) uses the term information literacy in order to describe the ability to recognize information when it is found, and further to determine if it is the best, most accurate, or most current information available.
Types of information
Information sources might be:
- Textual or literary sources: articles, books, brochures, pamphlets.
- Audio sources: audio-interviews, soundclips.
- Audio-visual sources: Tv-programs, Documentary movies.
Criteria for evaluating information
The following criteria for source evaluation is taken from the American Library Association (1994) and Engeldinger (1988):
- How was the source located?
- What type of source is it?
- Who is the author and what are the qualifications of the author in regard to the topic that is discussed?
- When was the information published?
- In which country was it published?
- What is the reputation of the publisher?
- Does the source show a particular cultural or political bias?
For literary sources we might add complementing criteria:
- Does the source contain a bibliography?
- Has the material been reviewed by a group of peers, or has it been edited?
- How does the article/book compare with similar articles/books?
References
- American Library Association (1994) Evaluating Information: A Basic Checklist. Brochure. American Library Association
- Engeldinger, Eugene A. (1988) Bibliographic Instruction and Critical Thinking: The Contribution of the Annotated Bibliography. Research Quarterly, Vol. 28, Winter, p. 195-202
- Engeldinger, Eugene A. (1998) Technology Infrastructure and Information Literacy. Library Philosophy and Practice Vol. 1, No. 1