User talk:76.22.25.102: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Wow, thanks for replying to a year old post.: new section |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Wow, thanks for replying to a year old post. == |
== Wow, thanks for replying to a year old post. == |
||
It wasn't about facts. It was a cover up. If the hostage had been a regular guy, his kidnapping would have been widely known. Get your facts straight. And belated thanks for your sarcastic comment. --[[Special:Contributions/72.186.99.104|72.186.99.104]] ([[User talk:72.186.99.104|talk]]) 17:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC) |
It wasn't about facts. It was a cover up. If the hostage had been a regular guy, his kidnapping would have been widely known. And yes, I provided reliable information from an Afghan news agency and an Italian news agency. And obviously, the information turned out to be factually accurate and factually verifiable. Get your facts straight. And belated thanks for your sarcastic comment. --[[Special:Contributions/72.186.99.104|72.186.99.104]] ([[User talk:72.186.99.104|talk]]) 17:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC) |
||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:97.106.45.230 |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:97.106.45.230 |
||
Revision as of 17:34, 30 August 2010
Wow, thanks for replying to a year old post.
It wasn't about facts. It was a cover up. If the hostage had been a regular guy, his kidnapping would have been widely known. And yes, I provided reliable information from an Afghan news agency and an Italian news agency. And obviously, the information turned out to be factually accurate and factually verifiable. Get your facts straight. And belated thanks for your sarcastic comment. --72.186.99.104 (talk) 17:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)