Talk:Pearle Vision: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:30, 3 September 2010

Business A‑class High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
A	This article has been rated as A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stub

The last paragraph in the article needs review, whether or not Pearle Vision actually "rips off senior citizens", it should probably be restated using more neutral language. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.170.165 (talk) 08:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are several consumer complaint websites citing Pearle Vision. Examples of issues on their Wiki were taken from these sites. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valphoto (talk • contribs) 11:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because there are consumer complaint websites, none are cited, and the wording of the last paragrah is atrocious and not neutral. Neutrality and Citability are the two #1 rules of writing for Wikipedia. The paragraph has been removed as it did not contribute anything to the article. If you want to write about their business ethics, do it more professionally and neutrally. That was not the way to do it in any form.

Revision as of 11:56, 30 July 2010 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,550,529 edits m Signing comment by Valphoto - "added reference and explanation." ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:30, 3 September 2010 edit undo 206.223.21.11 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	There are several consumer complaint websites citing Pearle Vision. Examples of issues on their Wiki were taken from these sites. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Valphoto\|Valphoto]] ([[User talk:Valphoto\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Valphoto\|contribs]]) 11:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		There are several consumer complaint websites citing Pearle Vision. Examples of issues on their Wiki were taken from these sites. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Valphoto\|Valphoto]] ([[User talk:Valphoto\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Valphoto\|contribs]]) 11:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

			Just because there are consumer complaint websites, none are cited, and the wording of the last paragrah is atrocious and not neutral. Neutrality and Citability are the two #1 rules of writing for Wikipedia. The paragraph has been removed as it did not contribute anything to the article. If you want to write about their business ethics, do it more professionally and neutrally. That was not the way to do it in any form.