Talk:List of electrical phenomena: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:30, 25 October 2002

Please see Talk:Biological phenomenon. I think this article should be deleted. Similarly with the other articles "X phenomenon" that Fred added. --Larry Sanger

I disagree. This seems to be a perfectly decent bit of infrastructure, like the various 'list' pages. I can easily imagine finding it useful to make a link to this page from another site. Matthew Woodcraft

The best one so far is optical phenomenon. I think it shows both how interesting and useful this approach is. Fredbauder 17:30 Oct 25, 2002 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:28, 24 October 2002 edit Matthew Woodcraft (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 729 edits disagree ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:30, 25 October 2002 edit undo Fredbauder (talk \| contribs) 2,319 edits Why phenomenon xxx Next edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I disagree. This seems to be a perfectly decent bit of infrastructure, like the various 'list' pages. I can easily imagine finding it useful to make a link to this page from another site. [[User:Matthew Woodcraft\|Matthew Woodcraft]]		I disagree. This seems to be a perfectly decent bit of infrastructure, like the various 'list' pages. I can easily imagine finding it useful to make a link to this page from another site. [[User:Matthew Woodcraft\|Matthew Woodcraft]]

			The best one so far is [[optical phenomenon]]. I think it shows both how interesting and useful this approach is. [[User:Fredbauder\|Fredbauder]] 17:30 Oct 25, 2002 (UTC)