Preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{db-nocontext}} |
{{db-nocontext}} |
||
{{hang on}} |
|||
PROMETHEE & GAIA<ref name="Figueria">{{cite book|title=Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys|author=J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott|year=2005|publisher=Springer Verlag }}</ref> are multicriteria decision aid methods that belong to the family of outranking relations. They both offer a descriptive and a prescriptive approach. |
PROMETHEE & GAIA<ref name="Figueria">{{cite book|title=Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys|author=J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott|year=2005|publisher=Springer Verlag }}</ref> are multicriteria decision aid methods that belong to the family of outranking relations. They both offer a descriptive and a prescriptive approach. |
||
Revision as of 16:36, 27 September 2010
This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a very short article lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. See CSD A1.
If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message. Note that this article may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.
Note to administrators: this article has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion. Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.This page was last edited by Qhayez (contribs | logs) at 16:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC) (13 years ago) |
Template:Hang on PROMETHEE & GAIA[1] are multicriteria decision aid methods that belong to the family of outranking relations. They both offer a descriptive and a prescriptive approach.
On the one hand, the descriptive approach, called GAIA[2], allows the decision maker to visualize his problem. As a consequence, he is able to easily identify conflicts or synergies between criteria, to categorize alternatives and to highlight interesting performances. On the other hand, the prescriptive approach, called PROMETHEE[3] (Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluation), provides the decision maker both a complete and a partial ranking of the alternatives.
The PROMETHEE method has been initiated by Professor Jean-Pierre Brans in the beginning of the eighties[4]. Over the last 30 years, a number of researchers from the CoDE-SMG laboratory of the Université Libre de Bruxelles have also contributed to the development of this methodology. Among them, one can cite Professor Philippe Vincke or Professor Bertrand Mareschal. These research topics mainly cover the creation of visualization tools, the integration of uncertainty modeling, the development of robustness and sensitivity analysis tools or the group decision making aspects.
PROMETHEE has successfully been used in a number of complex decision making problems. Nowadays, hundreds of scientific papers describe its application to numerous area[5] including finance, chemistry, environmental management, logistics ...
References
- ^ J. Figueira, S. Greco, and M. Ehrgott (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Springer Verlag.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Template:Cite article
- ^ Template:Cite article
- ^ Template:Cite article
- ^ Template:Cite article