Jump to content

Barnum effect: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
copy edit article, fix typos
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Refimprove|date=August 2009}}
{{Refimprove|date=August 2009}}
The '''Forer effect''' (also called the '''Barnum Effect''' after [[P.T. Barnum]]'s observation that "we've got something for everyone") is the observation that individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically for them, but are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. This effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some beliefs and practices, such as [[astrology]], [[fortune telling]], and some types of [[personality test]]s.
The '''Forer effect''' (also called the '''Barnum Effect''' after [[P.T. Barnum]]'s observation that "we've got something for everyone") is the observation that individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically for them, but are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. This effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some beliefs and practices, such as [[astrology]], [[fortune telling]], [[religion|religious counseling]] and some types of [[personality test]]s.


A related and more generic phenomenon effect is that of [[subjective validation]].<ref name="Marks">{{cite book |last=Marks |first=David F |authorlink=David Marks (psychologist) |title=The Psychology of the Psychic |publisher=Prometheus Books |location=Amherst, New York |date=2000 |edition=2 |pages=41 |isbn=1573927988 |url=http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Psychology-of-the-Psychic/David-F-Marks/e/9781573927987/?itm=1}}</ref> Subjective validation occurs when two unrelated or even random events are perceived to be related because a belief, expectancy, or hypothesis demands a relationship. Thus people seek a correspondence between their perception of their personality and the contents of a horoscope.
A related and more generic phenomenon effect is that of [[subjective validation]].<ref name="Marks">{{cite book |last=Marks |first=David F |authorlink=David Marks (psychologist) |title=The Psychology of the Psychic |publisher=Prometheus Books |location=Amherst, New York |date=2000 |edition=2 |pages=41 |isbn=1573927988 |url=http://search.barnesandnoble.com/The-Psychology-of-the-Psychic/David-F-Marks/e/9781573927987/?itm=1}}</ref> Subjective validation occurs when two unrelated or even random events are perceived to be related because a belief, expectancy, or hypothesis demands a relationship. Thus people seek a correspondence between their perception of their personality and the contents of a horoscope.

Revision as of 02:59, 1 October 2010

The Forer effect (also called the Barnum Effect after P.T. Barnum's observation that "we've got something for everyone") is the observation that individuals will give high accuracy ratings to descriptions of their personality that supposedly are tailored specifically for them, but are in fact vague and general enough to apply to a wide range of people. This effect can provide a partial explanation for the widespread acceptance of some beliefs and practices, such as astrology, fortune telling, religious counseling and some types of personality tests.

A related and more generic phenomenon effect is that of subjective validation.[1] Subjective validation occurs when two unrelated or even random events are perceived to be related because a belief, expectancy, or hypothesis demands a relationship. Thus people seek a correspondence between their perception of their personality and the contents of a horoscope.

Forer's demonstration

In 1948, psychologist Bertram R. Forer gave a personality test to his students. Afterward, he told his students they were each receiving a unique personality analysis that was based on the test's results and to rate their analysis on a scale of 0 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) on how well it applied to themselves. In reality, each received the same analysis:

You have a great need for other people to like and admire you. You have a tendency to be critical of yourself. You have a great deal of unused capacity which you have not turned to your advantage. While you have some personality weaknesses, you are generally able to compensate for them. Disciplined and self-controlled outside, you tend to be worrisome and insecure inside. At times you have serious doubts as to whether you have made the right decision or done the right thing. You prefer a certain amount of change and variety and become dissatisfied when hemmed in by restrictions and limitations. You pride yourself as an independent thinker and do not accept others' statements without satisfactory proof. You have found it unwise to be too frank in revealing yourself to others. At times you are extroverted, affable, sociable, while at other times you are introverted, wary, reserved. Some of your aspirations tend to be pretty unrealistic. Security is one of your major goals in life.

On average, the rating was 4.26, but only after the ratings were turned in was it revealed that each student had received identical copies assembled by Forer from various horoscopes.[2] As can be seen from the profile, there are a number of statements that could apply equally to anyone. These statements later became known as Barnum statements after P.T. Barnum, who used them in his performances, allegedly stating "there's a sucker born every minute." This, if he had said it, would be reference to the fact that Barnum statements can gull people into thinking they have been accurately assessed by the speaker or test when in fact the outcome could apply to anyone.[citation needed]

Variables influencing the effect

Later studies have found that subjects give higher accuracy ratings if the following are true:

  • the subject believes that the analysis applies only to him or her
  • the subject believes in the authority of the evaluator
  • the analysis lists mainly positive traits

See Dickson and Kelly for a review of the literature.[3]

See also

References

  1. ^ Marks, David F (2000). The Psychology of the Psychic (2 ed.). Amherst, New York: Prometheus Books. p. 41. ISBN 1573927988.
  2. ^ Forer, B.R. (1949). "The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility". Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 44 (1). American Psychological Association: 118–123. doi:10.1037/h0059240.
  3. ^ Dickson, D.H. (1985). "The 'Barnum Effect' in Personality Assessment: A Review of the Literature". Psychological Reports. 57 (1). Missoula: 367–382. ISSN 0033-2941. OCLC 1318827. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)