Talk:Magical formula: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Ideas for Direction== |
==Ideas for Direction== |
||
Aleister Crowley gives quite a list of, "Barbarious Names." If anyone has spent some time analyzing them they would be great to include here with rational for explanation.--[[User:Anxfisa|Anxfisa]] ([[User talk:Anxfisa|talk]]) 06:49, 12 September 2008 (UTC) |
Aleister Crowley gives quite a list of, "Barbarious Names." If anyone has spent some time analyzing them they would be great to include here with rational for explanation.--[[User:Anxfisa|Anxfisa]] ([[User talk:Anxfisa|talk]]) 06:49, 12 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
==Issue with tone of article== |
|||
This article is written in the tone of an enthusiast in the subject, rather than that of a dictionary. From the first bewildering sentence to the short, arbitrary list of "spells", this article misses the point and should be replaced with a concise explanation of the cultural phenomenon, and not a few specifics, of such formulae.[[Special:Contributions/66.30.9.239|66.30.9.239]] ([[User talk:66.30.9.239|talk]]) 05:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:08, 1 October 2010
Items removed from article
- ALIM.
- ARARITA.
- FIAT.
- LVX.
- MVAVM.
- NOX.
- VITRIOL.
The above without any commentary are inapplicable, although I'm sure they all have some meaning (I believe LVX denotes the devil in Latin script). __meco 15:18, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Concur. Note; LVX added with comment and analysis on 10 September 2008. It looks like most of these words, if properly analyzed, would be appropriate for this article. --Anxfisa (talk) 08:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Ideas for Direction
Aleister Crowley gives quite a list of, "Barbarious Names." If anyone has spent some time analyzing them they would be great to include here with rational for explanation.--Anxfisa (talk) 06:49, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Issue with tone of article
This article is written in the tone of an enthusiast in the subject, rather than that of a dictionary. From the first bewildering sentence to the short, arbitrary list of "spells", this article misses the point and should be replaced with a concise explanation of the cultural phenomenon, and not a few specifics, of such formulae.66.30.9.239 (talk) 05:08, 1 October 2010 (UTC)