Talk:Non-adjacent form: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:17, 8 February 2006

The paragraph on alternating signs is not correct. Just consider the binary representation of decimal 9, being 1001, which is its unique NAF form.

Revision as of 20:15, 8 February 2006 edit Kornerup (talk \| contribs) 7 edits No edit summary		Revision as of 20:17, 8 February 2006 edit undo Kornerup (talk \| contribs) 7 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~I have deleted the~~ paragraph on alternating signs~~, as it~~ ~~was~~ not correct. Just consider the binary representation of decimal 9, being 1001, which is its unique NAF form.		The paragraph on alternating signs is not correct. Just consider the binary representation of decimal 9, being 1001, which is its unique NAF form.