The Fatal Conceit: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
noted omission |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
==Main thesis and arguments== |
==Main thesis and arguments== |
||
The book attempts to conclusively refute all forms of [[Socialism]] by demonstrating that socialist theories are not only logically incorrect but that the premises they use to form their arguments are incorrect as well. To Hayek the birth of civilization is due to the start of societal traditions placing importance on [[private property]] leading to expansion, trade, and eventually the modern capitalist system, also known as the [[extended order]]<ref>Hayek, F.A. "The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism". The University of Chicago Press. 1991. Page 6. </ref>. Socialists are wrong because they disregard the fact that modern civilization naturally evolved and was not planned. Additionally, since modern civilization and all of its customs and traditions naturally led to the current order and are needed for its continuance, any fundamental change to the system that tries to control it is doomed to fail since it would be impossible or unsustainable in modern civilization. [[Price signals]] are the only means of enabling each economic decision maker to communicate [[tacit knowledge]] or [[dispersed knowledge]] to each other, in order to solve the [[economic calculation problem]]. |
The book attempts to conclusively refute all forms of [[Socialism]] by demonstrating that socialist theories are not only logically incorrect but that the premises they use to form their arguments are incorrect as well. |
||
This must be understood in its logical context: If socialism is shown to be bad, the contrapositive is not proven eg that does not mean that capitalism is necessarily good. Arguments for and against each end of the political spectrum overlook the possibility of a third way that would be better (or not). |
|||
To Hayek the birth of civilization is due to the start of societal traditions placing importance on [[private property]] leading to expansion, trade, and eventually the modern capitalist system, also known as the [[extended order]]<ref>Hayek, F.A. "The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism". The University of Chicago Press. 1991. Page 6. </ref>. Socialists are wrong because they disregard the fact that modern civilization naturally evolved and was not planned. Additionally, since modern civilization and all of its customs and traditions naturally led to the current order and are needed for its continuance, any fundamental change to the system that tries to control it is doomed to fail since it would be impossible or unsustainable in modern civilization. [[Price signals]] are the only means of enabling each economic decision maker to communicate [[tacit knowledge]] or [[dispersed knowledge]] to each other, in order to solve the [[economic calculation problem]]. |
|||
==Contents== |
==Contents== |
||
Revision as of 17:16, 8 October 2010
| File:The fatal conceit hayek.jpg | |
| Author | Friedrich Hayek |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Series | The Collected Works of F. A. Hayek |
| Subject | Politics, Economics |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (US), Routledge Press (UK) |
Publication date | 1988 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Pages | 194 |
| ISBN | 0-226-32066-9 |
| OCLC | 24815557 |
The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism is a non-fiction book written by the economist and political philosopher Friedrich Hayek and edited by William Warren Bartley.
Main thesis and arguments
The book attempts to conclusively refute all forms of Socialism by demonstrating that socialist theories are not only logically incorrect but that the premises they use to form their arguments are incorrect as well.
This must be understood in its logical context: If socialism is shown to be bad, the contrapositive is not proven eg that does not mean that capitalism is necessarily good. Arguments for and against each end of the political spectrum overlook the possibility of a third way that would be better (or not).
To Hayek the birth of civilization is due to the start of societal traditions placing importance on private property leading to expansion, trade, and eventually the modern capitalist system, also known as the extended order[1]. Socialists are wrong because they disregard the fact that modern civilization naturally evolved and was not planned. Additionally, since modern civilization and all of its customs and traditions naturally led to the current order and are needed for its continuance, any fundamental change to the system that tries to control it is doomed to fail since it would be impossible or unsustainable in modern civilization. Price signals are the only means of enabling each economic decision maker to communicate tacit knowledge or dispersed knowledge to each other, in order to solve the economic calculation problem.
Contents
- Introduction: Was Socialism a Mistake?
- 1. Between Instinct and Reason
- 2. The Origins of Liberty, Property and Justice
- 3. The Evolution of the Market: Trade and Civilisation
- 4. The Revolt of Instinct and Reason
- 5. The Fatal Conceit
- 6. The Mysterious World of Trade and Money
- 7. Our Poisoned Language
- 8. The Extended Order and Population Growth
- 9. Religion and the Guardians of Tradition
- Appendix A. 'Natural' vs. 'Artificial'
- Appendix B. The Complexity of Problems of Human Interaction
- Appendix C. Time and the Emergence and Replication of Structures
- Appendix D. Alienation, Dropouts, and the Claims of Parasites
- Appendix E. Play, the School of Rules
- Appendix F. Remarks on the Economics and Anthropology of Population
- Appendix G. Superstition and the Preservation of Tradition
Controversy
There is much scholarly debate on how much influence William Warren Bartley had on writing the book.[2] Officially, Bartley was the editor who was supposed to prepare the book for publication once Hayek fell ill in 1985; however, the inclusion of material from Bartley's philosophical point of view and citations that other people provided to Bartley[3] have led people to question how much of the book was written by Hayek and whether Hayek knew about the added material.
References
- ^ Hayek, F.A. "The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism". The University of Chicago Press. 1991. Page 6.
- ^ Alan Ebenstein. "The Fatal Deceit". Liberty. Retrieved 2008-07-06.
- ^ Friedman, Jeffrey (1998). "What's Wrong with Libertarianism?". Critical Review. Summer 1998: 463.