Jump to content

User talk:Fredbauder/Notes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Fredbauder (talk | contribs)
redirect to Fred Bauder
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[User talk:Fred Bauder]]
[[Welcome, newcomers|Welcome]] to the 'pedia! It is always nice to greet a new [[wikipedian]]. Anyway, I converted the [[Rio Bravo]] article you made into a redirect to [[Rio Grande River]] since the info in it was already in that article and we tend to only use terms that a majority of English speakers would know and use themselves. I know you are new so you might want to check out our [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions|naming conventions]] - which is a useful read. Hope you like the place and decide to [[wikipediholic|stay]]. Cheers! --[[maveric149]]

----

Hi Fred, I've found and fixed the errors in the tables of the country pages. [[User:Jheijmans|Jeronimo]] 13:08 Aug 5, 2002 (PDT)

----
Fred--nice work on the investment pages. One note: it's generally better to use redirects than piping. --[[User:The Cunctator|The Cunctator]]

----
Fred--why the one-sentence imports from the LoC? These aren't most-wanteds. [[Wikipedia is not a dictionary]]. [[User:Vicki Rosenzweig|Vicki Rosenzweig]]

Vicki, any entry in the Library of Congress Subject Index is either a search term someone is likely to use or a subject upon which books have been written. What was interesting is that although I spent a few minutes doing those few entries; making them was the entrepot for a bunch of related stuff like converting all the [[Australian Aborigine]] entries to being capitalized, so a lot of useful work did get done.

:These are arguments for actually writing articles--not one-sentence dictionary stubs--on the subjects later. The one-sentence stubs aren't going to satisfy someone who's doing a search. [[User:Vicki Rosenzweig|Vicki Rosenzweig]]
----
Re: your posting on [[User talk:Juuitchan]]: Replaced the map on [[China]] by an english one, we already had one. -- [[User:JeLuF|JeLuF]]

----
Re: [[United Nations Charter]] - Why is it relevant to mention that the US
ratified it? - [[User:Khendon|Khendon]] 13:50 Oct 10, 2002 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:43, 31 October 2002