Democrat Party (epithet): Difference between revisions
m →Modern usage: the issue |
grammar |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''"Democrat Party"''' is a political [[epithet]] used in the [[United States]] instead of "Democratic Party" when talking about the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]].<ref>In 1952, "Eisenhower referred to his opposition as “the Democrat Party,” a GOP epithet,"({{cite book|title=White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters|year=2008|page= 96|author =Schlesinger, Robert|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=J0cgX49-WqgC&pg=PA96|accessdate=2010-09-21|isbn=0743291700|publisher=[[Simon and Schuster]]}})</ref> The term has been used by [[American conservatism|conservative]] commentators and members of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] in party platforms, partisan speeches and press releases since 1940.<ref name = safire1993>Safire (1993), pp. 163–164</ref> |
'''"Democrat Party"''' is a political [[epithet]] used in the [[United States]] instead of "Democratic Party" when talking about the [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic Party]].<ref>In 1952, "Eisenhower referred to his opposition as “the Democrat Party,” a GOP epithet,"({{cite book|title=White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters|year=2008|page= 96|author =Schlesinger, Robert|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=J0cgX49-WqgC&pg=PA96|accessdate=2010-09-21|isbn=0743291700|publisher=[[Simon and Schuster]]}})</ref> The term has been used by [[American conservatism|conservative]] commentators and members of the [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican Party]] in party platforms, partisan speeches and press releases since 1940.<ref name = safire1993>Safire (1993), pp. 163–164</ref> |
||
Multiple reasons are suggested for the use of the term. A 1984 New York Times article suggested Republican's began to use the term when Democrats used their own party name to |
Multiple reasons are suggested for the use of the term. A 1984 New York Times article suggested Republican's began to use the term when Democrats used their own party name to imply "they are the only true adherents of democracy."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9904EFD61538F934A2575BC0A962948260 |title=Democrats Find Ally In Republican Camp |publisher=UPI |date=August 17, 1984 |work=New York Times }}</ref> Republicans "feared that 'Democratic' suggested Democrats [had] a monopoly on or are somehow the anointed custodians of the concept of democracy."<ref> Roy H. Copperud, ''American Usage and Style: The Consensus'' (Van Nostrand 1980) p 101-2 </ref> ''[[The New Yorker|New Yorker]]'' commentator [[Hendrik Hertzberg]] wrote in 2006 that the term "is a slur intended to ... express contempt."<ref name="Hertzberg">{{cite news | first=Hendrik |last=Hertzberg |authorlink=Hendrik Hertzberg |title = The “Ic” Factor | date = 2006-08-07 | url = http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/08/07/060807ta_talk_hertzberg | publisher = [[The New Yorker]] | accessdate = 2007-03-31}}</ref> He also stated that polling in 2001, however, indicated only "deeply committed" Democrats found the term offensive.<ref name="Hertzberg"/> Political analyst [[Charlie Cook]] attributed modern use of the term to force of habit rather than a deliberate epithet by Republicans.<ref name="Copeland">{{cite news | first=Libby |last=Copleand |title = President's Sin of Omission? (Dropped Syllable in Speech Riles Democrats) | date = 2007-01-25 | url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/24/AR2007012402469.html | work = [[The Washington Post]] | accessdate = 2007-03-31}}</ref> [[Ruth Marcus (journalist)|Ruth Marcus]] stated that Republicans likely only continue to employ the term because Democrats dislike it.<ref name="Marcus"/> Marcus stated that disagreements over use of the term are "trivial",<ref name="Marcus"/> and Hertzberg calls use of the term "a minor irritation."<ref name="Hertzberg"/> |
||
Similar two-word phrases, using "Democrat" as an adjective have been deemed controversial when used as a substitute for "Democratic" (as in "Democrat idea"); NPR has banned the use of "Democrat" as an adjective.<ref>Ron Elving, the senior Washington editor of [[National Public Radio]] says the "Democrat" should not be used as an adjective. "We should not refer to Democrat ideas or Democrat votes. Any deviation from that by NPR reporters on air or on line should be corrected." [http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2010/03/since_when_did_it_become_the_d.html Ombudsman, "Since When Did It Become the Democrat Party?," NPR March 26, 2010, online]</ref> The term "Democrat Party" was in common use with no negative connotations by Democrats in some localities during the 1950s.<ref>Lyman (1958)</ref> The ''Dictionary of American Regional English'' gives numerous examples of "Democrat" being used as an adjective in everyday speech, especially in the Northeast.<ref>Frederic Gomes Cassidy and Joan Houston Hall. eds, ''Dictionary of American Regional English: Volume 2'' (1991) pp. 37-38, 1036 </ref> |
Similar two-word phrases, using "Democrat" as an adjective have been deemed controversial when used as a substitute for "Democratic" (as in "Democrat idea"); NPR has banned the use of "Democrat" as an adjective.<ref>Ron Elving, the senior Washington editor of [[National Public Radio]] says the "Democrat" should not be used as an adjective. "We should not refer to Democrat ideas or Democrat votes. Any deviation from that by NPR reporters on air or on line should be corrected." [http://www.npr.org/blogs/ombudsman/2010/03/since_when_did_it_become_the_d.html Ombudsman, "Since When Did It Become the Democrat Party?," NPR March 26, 2010, online]</ref> The term "Democrat Party" was in common use with no negative connotations by Democrats in some localities during the 1950s.<ref>Lyman (1958)</ref> The ''Dictionary of American Regional English'' gives numerous examples of "Democrat" being used as an adjective in everyday speech, especially in the Northeast.<ref>Frederic Gomes Cassidy and Joan Houston Hall. eds, ''Dictionary of American Regional English: Volume 2'' (1991) pp. 37-38, 1036 </ref> |
Revision as of 02:08, 12 November 2010
"Democrat Party" is a political epithet used in the United States instead of "Democratic Party" when talking about the Democratic Party.[1] The term has been used by conservative commentators and members of the Republican Party in party platforms, partisan speeches and press releases since 1940.[2]
Multiple reasons are suggested for the use of the term. A 1984 New York Times article suggested Republican's began to use the term when Democrats used their own party name to imply "they are the only true adherents of democracy."[3] Republicans "feared that 'Democratic' suggested Democrats [had] a monopoly on or are somehow the anointed custodians of the concept of democracy."[4] New Yorker commentator Hendrik Hertzberg wrote in 2006 that the term "is a slur intended to ... express contempt."[5] He also stated that polling in 2001, however, indicated only "deeply committed" Democrats found the term offensive.[5] Political analyst Charlie Cook attributed modern use of the term to force of habit rather than a deliberate epithet by Republicans.[6] Ruth Marcus stated that Republicans likely only continue to employ the term because Democrats dislike it.[7] Marcus stated that disagreements over use of the term are "trivial",[7] and Hertzberg calls use of the term "a minor irritation."[5]
Similar two-word phrases, using "Democrat" as an adjective have been deemed controversial when used as a substitute for "Democratic" (as in "Democrat idea"); NPR has banned the use of "Democrat" as an adjective.[8] The term "Democrat Party" was in common use with no negative connotations by Democrats in some localities during the 1950s.[9] The Dictionary of American Regional English gives numerous examples of "Democrat" being used as an adjective in everyday speech, especially in the Northeast.[10]
History of usage
The history of the term has been traced by scholars.[11][12][13][14] The earliest reported use of the term, according to the Oxford English Dictionary, came in 1890: "Whether a little farmer from South Carolina named Tillman is going to rule the Democrat Party in America – yet it is this, and not output, on which the proximate value of silver depends."[15]
Modern usage of the term has been traced by William Safire to Thomas Dewey who he credits with its creation.[2] The term gained popularity during the 1940 presidential campaign of Wendell Wilkie. Wilkie's campaign manager Harold Stassen said, regarding his use in the 1940s, that because the Democratic Party was controlled "by Hague in New Jersey, Pendergast in Missouri and Kelly-Nash in Chicago, [it] should not be called a 'Democratic Party.' It should be called the 'Democrat Party.'"[16]
The noun-as-adjective has been used by Republican leaders since the 1940s in most GOP national platforms since 1948.[17] By the early 1950s the term was in widespread use among Republicans of all factions.[18] In 1968, Congressional Quarterly reported that at its national convention "the GOP did revert to the epithet of 'Democrat' party. The phrase had been used in 1952 and 1956 but not in 1960.".[19]
Use of the term has been a point of contention within the Republican Party. In 1984, when a delegate of the Republican platform committee asked unanimous consent to change a platform amendment to read the Democrat Party instead of Democratic Party, Representative Jack Kemp objected, saying that would be "an insult to our Democratic friends" and The committee dropped the proposal.[20] In 1996, the wording throughout the Republican party platform was changed from "Democratic Party" to "Democrat Party": Republican leaders " explained they wanted to make the subtle point that the Democratic Party had become elitist".[21] A proposal to use the term again the in August 2008 Republican Platform for similar reasons was voted down with leaders choosing to use "Democratic Party". "We probably should use what the actual name is," said Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, the panel's chairman. "At least in writing."[21]
The term has been used by Ralph Nader.[22]
Modern usage
Following his inauguration in 2001, President George W. Bush often used the noun-as-adjective when referring to the opposition party.[23] Likewise, it has been used by former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay,[24] House Minority Leader John Boehner,[25] Senator Charles Grassley,[26] Congressman Steve Buyer,[27] and other Republicans. In 2006, Ruth Marcus, a columnist for The Washington Post, noted that "[t]he derisive use of 'Democrat' in this way was a Bush staple during the recent campaign", and she chastised Bush, alleging he was being intentionally offensive.[7] Marcus went on to say the argument about the term was "trivial, sticks-and-stones [...] linguistic bickering".[7]
Bush spoke of the "Democrat majority" in his 2007 State of the Union Address.[28] The advance copy that was given to members of Congress read "Democratic majority."[6] Democrats again complained about the use of "Democrat" as an adjective in the address. "Like nails on a chalkboard," complained Clinton White House Chief of Staff John Podesta.[6] Commentators debated whether Bush was intentionally using the term. Congressional Historian Julian E. Zelizer said "It's hard to disentangle whether that's an intentional slight".[6] Political analyst Charlie Cook doubted it was a deliberate attempt to offend Democrats saying Republicans "have been doing it [using the term] so long that they probably don't even realize they're doing it."[6]
Bush later joked about the issue by talking about his leadership of the "Republic Party" the following month.[29] On February 4, 2007, Bush joked in a speech to House Democrats, stating "Now look, my diction isn't all that good. I have been accused of occasionally mangling the English language. And so I appreciate you inviting the head of the Republic Party."[30]
Alaska governor and Republican Party vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin used the term during the 2008 United States presidential campaign.[31][32]
Democrat has been used as an adjective by USA Today.[33] In Indiana there are several legally incorporated organizations with "Democrat" as part of their official name, such as the "Indianapolis, 17th Ward Democrat Club Inc." and the "Andrew Jackson Democrat Club Of Tippecanoe County." [34]
Grammar
In American history many parties were named by their opponents (Federalists, Loco-Focos, Know Nothings, Populists, Dixiecrats), including the Democrats themselves, as the Federalists in the 1790s used "Democratic Party" as a term of ridicule.[35]
Responses
Delegates to the Democratic National Committee once proposed using "Publican Party" instead of "Republican Party". The committee failed to accept the proposal "explaining that Republican is the name by which the our opponents' product is known and mistrusted."[2] Sherman Yellen suggested "The Republicants" as suitably comparable in terms of negative connotation in an April 29, 2007 Huffington Post commentary.[36]
On the February 26, 2009 edition of Hardball with Chris Matthews, Republican Representative Darrell Issa referred to "a Democrat Congress". The host, Chris Matthews, took exception, saying:
Well, I think the Democratic Party calls itself the Democratic Party, not the Democrat Party. Do we have to do this every night? Why do people talk like this? Is this just fighting words to get the name on?[37]
Issa denied that he intended to use "fighting words". Matthews replied, "They call themselves the Democratic Party. Let’s just call people what they call themselves and stop the Mickey Mouse here - save that for the stump."[37]
In March 2009, after Representative Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) repeatedly used the phrase "Democrat Party" when questioning U.S. Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag, Representative Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) said:
I’d like to begin by saying to my colleague from Texas that there isn’t a single member on this side of the aisle that belongs to the “Democrat Party.” We belong to the Democratic Party. So the party you were referring to doesn’t even exist. And I would just appreciate the courtesy when you’re referring to our party, if you’re referring to the Democratic Party, to refer to it as such.[38]
Notes
- ^ In 1952, "Eisenhower referred to his opposition as “the Democrat Party,” a GOP epithet,"(Schlesinger, Robert (2008). White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters. Simon and Schuster. p. 96. ISBN 0743291700. Retrieved 2010-09-21.)
- ^ a b c Safire (1993), pp. 163–164
- ^ "Democrats Find Ally In Republican Camp". New York Times. UPI. August 17, 1984.
- ^ Roy H. Copperud, American Usage and Style: The Consensus (Van Nostrand 1980) p 101-2
- ^ a b c Hertzberg, Hendrik (2006-08-07). "The "Ic" Factor". The New Yorker. Retrieved 2007-03-31.
- ^ a b c d e Copleand, Libby (2007-01-25). "President's Sin of Omission? (Dropped Syllable in Speech Riles Democrats)". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-03-31.
- ^ a b c d Marcus, Ruth (November 22, 2006). "One Syllable of Civility". The Washington Post. pp. A21.
- ^ Ron Elving, the senior Washington editor of National Public Radio says the "Democrat" should not be used as an adjective. "We should not refer to Democrat ideas or Democrat votes. Any deviation from that by NPR reporters on air or on line should be corrected." Ombudsman, "Since When Did It Become the Democrat Party?," NPR March 26, 2010, online
- ^ Lyman (1958)
- ^ Frederic Gomes Cassidy and Joan Houston Hall. eds, Dictionary of American Regional English: Volume 2 (1991) pp. 37-38, 1036
- ^ Feuerlicht (1957)
- ^ Lyman (1958)
- ^ Safire (1993), pp. 163–164
- ^ Sperber and Trittschuh (1962)
- ^ OED under "Democrat" 4 citing the London Spectator 15 Nov. 1890 p 676.
- ^ Safire (1988), p. 35
- ^ National Party Platforms, 1840-1996, editors Kirk H. Porter, and Donald Bruce Johnson, (1996).
- ^ Feuerlicht (1957)
- ^ Congressional Quarterly, The Presidential nominating conventions, 1968 (1968) p.9
- ^ "Democrats Find Ally In Republican Camp". New York Times. UPI. August 17, 1984.
- ^ a b Woodward, Calvin (August 26, 2008). "No more 'Democrat wars' for GOP spinmeisters?". Associated Press. Retrieved 2010-10-25.
- ^ See "Transcript: Ralph Nader on 'Meet The Press' Sunday, May 7, 2000" at [1]; "Presidential candidate Ralph Nader makes stop in Minnesota; sees little difference between Bush, Kerry," Oct 27, 2004, at [2]
- ^ "Bush Courts Black Voters at Urban League" by the Associated Press, July 23, 2004.
- ^ "DeLay: Democratic Party Unfit to Lead", Fox News, July 26, 2003.
- ^ "Pelosi's Big Day", Slate, January 4, 2007.
- ^ "Alito: No Person Is Above the Law", Fox News, January 9, 2006.
- ^ "Transcript: House debates articles of impeachment", CNN, December 18, 1998.
- ^ Official 2007 State of the Union Transcript
- ^ Noam H. Levey (February 4, 2007). "Bush reaches across Partisan divide". Los Angeles Times.
- ^ Abramowitz, Michael; Kane, Paul (2007-02-04). "At Democrats' Meeting, Bush Appeals for Cooperation". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-03-31.
- ^ Matthew E. Berger (November 3, 2008). "Palin Talk Taxes, Slows Pace; Governor Stays Honed On Tax Attack In Final Stretch". National Journal.
- ^ John M. Broder and Julie Bosman (November 2, 2008). "In States Once Reliably Red, Palin and Biden Tighten Their Stump Speeches". New York Times.
- ^ John Solomon (October 11, 2006). "Democrat leader reaped $1.1 million from sale of land he didn't own". USA Today.
- ^ "Indiana Secretary of State website". Retrieved 2010-10-08.
- ^ Safire, (1993), 176
- ^ Yellen, Sherman (2007-04-29). "The Republicants". Retrieved 2010-10-25.
- ^ a b Mullins, Anne Schroeder (February 26, 2009). "Don't call Democrats, Democrats!". The Politico.
- ^ "Rep. Kaptur scolds GOP: 'Democrat Party' doesn't exist". thinkprogress.org. March 3, 2009. Retrieved 2009-03-04.
References
- This article incorporates material from the Citizendium article "Democrat Party (epithet)", which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License but not under the GFDL.
- Copperud, Roy H. (1980). American Usage and Style: The Consensus. pp. 101–102.
- Feuerlicht, Ignace. "Democrat Party", American Speech, Vol. 32, No. 3 (Oct., 1957), pp. 228–231 (online in JSTOR)
- Lyman, John (October 1958). "Democrat Party". American Speech. 33 (3): 239–40.
- Nunberg, Geoffrey (2005). "The Case for Democracy", "Fresh Air" commentary (radio broadcast), January 19, 2005
- Nunberg, Geoffrey (2006), Talking Right: How Conservatives Turned Liberalism into a Tax-Raising, Latte-Drinking, Sushi-Eating, Volvo-Driving, New York Times-Reading, Body-Piercing, Hollywood-Loving, Left-Wing Freak Show, 2006.
- Safire, William (1988). You could look it up: more on language. Times Books.
- Safire, William (1993). Safire's New Political Dictionary. Random House. ISBN 0679420681.
- Sperber, Hans; Trittschuh, Travis (1962). American Political Terms: An Historical Dictionary. pp. 117–23.
Further reading
- Garner, Bryan A. (1998). A Dictionary of Modern American Usage. p. 196.
- Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. 1994. pp. 328–29, 667.
- Walker, Ruth. "Republicans, Democrats, and the Afghan on the couch", Christian Science Monitor, January 27, 2005