Jump to content

User talk:Fasach Nua: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 17: Line 17:


Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

== Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/José_Paranhos,_Viscount_of_Rio_Branco/archive1 ==

I have queried your oppose on this article, and would appreciate a response before you delete this notice. [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 19:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
:Thank-you, but I have no intention of doing so. Your behvaiour was rude to the point of violating [[WP:DICK]]. However, I would invite you to discuss this matter further, either here or, more preferably, on the FAC page. The exact violation in WIAFA of including the template would be appreciated. Many thanks, [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 19:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:10, 17 November 2010

!

Hong Kong FAC

Hello Fasach Nua, your concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hong Kong/archive4 have been addressed, please consider withdrawing your objection. Thanks, Ta-Va-Tar (discuss?) 12:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian heraldry FAC

I believe I have addressed your image concerns (though I did, also, express disappointment in the way you raised the concerns). Can you please comment on the FAC one way or the other? Thank you. → ROUX  22:35, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've added fair use rationale, hopefully you can strike strike strike your oppose oppose oppose or tell me what else ought to be done. Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've eliminated those images entirely, so unless there's some problem with the other images (I doubt it, fan photos), I'd be grateful if you could strike the oppose.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]