User talk:Fasach Nua: Difference between revisions
→Branco FAC: new section |
Fasach Nua (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — <b>[[User:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">Hun</font>]][[User talk:Hunter Kahn|<font color="#C0C0C0">ter</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Hunter_Kahn|<font color="#595454">Ka</font>]][[User:Hunter Kahn/Autographs|<font color="#595454">hn</font>]]</b> 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Branco FAC == |
|||
I certainly don't want to conflict with you on your talk-page, so should you remove this, as I imagine you will, I won't bring the matter up here again. But would you be up for discussing the issue further on the FAC page, about the inclusion of the template? I'm unsure of which criteria in WIAFA it fails, given that it is an external template in the article and not really part of the article or the FAC; as such, it seems unfair to penalize the writer for its inclusion. I look forward to discussing this, [[User:Skinny87|Skinny87]] ([[User talk:Skinny87|talk]]) 19:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 19:20, 17 November 2010
!
Hong Kong FAC
Hello Fasach Nua, your concerns at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hong Kong/archive4 have been addressed, please consider withdrawing your objection. Thanks, Ta-Va-Tar (discuss–?) 12:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Canadian heraldry FAC
I believe I have addressed your image concerns (though I did, also, express disappointment in the way you raised the concerns). Can you please comment on the FAC one way or the other? Thank you. → ROUX ₪ 22:35, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
I've added fair use rationale, hopefully you can strike strike strike your oppose oppose oppose or tell me what else ought to be done. Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
- I've eliminated those images entirely, so unless there's some problem with the other images (I doubt it, fan photos), I'd be grateful if you could strike the oppose.--Wehwalt (talk) 15:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey Fasach. I'm removed the infobox image from this article, in part based on other comments on the FAC that agreed with your position. Although I'm sure you haven't reviewed the rest of the article to the point that you'd be ready or willing to support the nomination, I was hoping you could strike your oppose vote, since the issue you raised has now been resolved. Thanks! — Hunter Kahn 01:45, 15 November 2010 (UTC)