User talk:Jeremystalked: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:Is skeptictank.org an acceptable source or convenience link? Take a look at that site and tell me what you think.<b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 22:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
:Is skeptictank.org an acceptable source or convenience link? Take a look at that site and tell me what you think.<b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 22:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
::We've already discussed this issue on this talk page. If there is a link in a citation that you object to then delete the link, not the entire citation. Just because the link for a Time magazine article goes to skeptictank doesn't mean that Time is no longer a reliable source. <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]] [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]] </b> 22:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
::We've already discussed this issue on this talk page. If there is a link in a citation that you object to then delete the link, not the entire citation. Just because the link for a Time magazine article goes to skeptictank doesn't mean that Time is no longer a reliable source. <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]] [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]] </b> 22:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::What if I am unable to verify that the cited Time magazine article even exists?<b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 22:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
:::What if I am unable to verify that the cited Time magazine article even exists, or if I'm unable to verify that it supports the claims made in the article?<b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 22:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:16, 3 December 2010
This is my talk page. When starting new topics, don't forget to create a new section.
Sources
If you continue to delete sources from articles I will block this account to stop the disruption. Will Beback talk 22:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- Is skeptictank.org an acceptable source or convenience link? Take a look at that site and tell me what you think.Jeremystalked(law 296) 22:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- We've already discussed this issue on this talk page. If there is a link in a citation that you object to then delete the link, not the entire citation. Just because the link for a Time magazine article goes to skeptictank doesn't mean that Time is no longer a reliable source. Will Beback talk 22:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- What if I am unable to verify that the cited Time magazine article even exists, or if I'm unable to verify that it supports the claims made in the article?Jeremystalked(law 296) 22:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
- We've already discussed this issue on this talk page. If there is a link in a citation that you object to then delete the link, not the entire citation. Just because the link for a Time magazine article goes to skeptictank doesn't mean that Time is no longer a reliable source. Will Beback talk 22:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)