Jump to content

User talk:Jeremystalked: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: Line 9:
::::What steps have you taken to verify these sources? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 22:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
::::What steps have you taken to verify these sources? &nbsp; <b>[[User:Will Beback|<font color="#595454">Will Beback</font>]]&nbsp; [[User talk:Will Beback|<font color="#C0C0C0">talk</font>]]&nbsp; </b> 22:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::Looking for online references to the alleged articles from reliable sources, or looking for copies of the alleged articles at the source's web site. What additional steps would you recommend?<b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 22:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::Looking for online references to the alleged articles from reliable sources, or looking for copies of the alleged articles at the source's web site. What additional steps would you recommend?<b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 22:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
:::::Also, in future when removing sources should I state how I attempted to verify the source, for each individual removal? Just trying to get clarification here.<b>[[User:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#fff;background:#080;">Jeremy</span>]][[User_talk:Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#080;">stalked</span>]]<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Jeremystalked|<span style="color:#00a;">(law 296)</span>]]</sub></b> 22:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:36, 3 December 2010

This is my talk page. When starting new topics, don't forget to create a new section.


Sources

If you continue to delete sources from articles I will block this account to stop the disruption.   Will Beback  talk  22:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is skeptictank.org an acceptable source or convenience link? Take a look at that site and tell me what you think.Jeremystalked(law 296) 22:09, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
We've already discussed this issue on this talk page. If there is a link in a citation that you object to then delete the link, not the entire citation. Just because the link for a Time magazine article goes to skeptictank doesn't mean that Time is no longer a reliable source.   Will Beback  talk  22:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What if I am unable to verify that the cited Time magazine article even exists, or if I'm unable to verify that it supports the claims made in the Wikipedia entry?Jeremystalked(law 296) 22:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What steps have you taken to verify these sources?   Will Beback  talk  22:24, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Looking for online references to the alleged articles from reliable sources, or looking for copies of the alleged articles at the source's web site. What additional steps would you recommend?Jeremystalked(law 296) 22:28, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also, in future when removing sources should I state how I attempted to verify the source, for each individual removal? Just trying to get clarification here.Jeremystalked(law 296) 22:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]