User talk:Tintor2

User talk:Tintor2/Archive 1 User talk:Tintor2/Archive 2 User talk:Tintor2/Archive 3 User talk:Tintor2/Archive 4 User talk:Tintor2/Archive 5 User talk:Tintor2/Archive 6

Ichigo Kurosaki

Ichigo's page is, quite frankly, messy in comparison to other anime character pages, like Naruto's. I've seen other people suggest to change its format, but they've all been shot down for one reason or another. Regardless, I feel that it's getting out of hand, and that at the very least his role in the plot should be seperate from his abilities. I'd do it myself, but I don't have the time or experience. Can you help? 207.216.200.81 (talk) 04:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Yeah... but if that's the case then pretty much every singal anime character article on Wikipedia is going to need 100% revising, because almost all of them have seperates sections for their powers, role in plot, background, etc. Sasuke Uchiha is a prime example. But I still think those articles, even if they don't fully conform to Wikipedia's guidelines, are better set up than Ichigo's currently is. 207.216.200.81 (talk) 19:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

I get what you're saying. But what I don't understand is that if Sasuke's and Naruto's and Ichigo's and everyone else's articles go against Wikipedia guidelines, why haven't they been flagged and revised by now? 207.216.200.81 (talk) 19:34, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

There would also be a lot of backlash from everyone, admins and anons alike, who prefer the current layouts regardless of the guidelines. Even if you or another admin were to edit it to conform to Wikipedia's guidelines, there would probably be an edit war. I've seen is that there are a lot of articles that don't conform, and nobody is doing anything about it. I'd like to say "Maybe the lack of editors has something to do with it too, but that's no excuse for the existing editors not to try", but I doubt that it would be successful unless all the admins were to get together and agree to make all the articles conform and lock them to prevent reversion. 207.216.200.81 (talk) 19:56, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the edits on XXXholic

Thanks for the edits to the references in XXXholics. I would, however, encourage you to take a little more time to clean your edits up before you save them. Looking through the section as it is now, your edits are missing a lot of words and aspects crucial to coherent sentence structure. You have all the time in the world to return to your edits, so try to spend more time making sure they read correctly before you save them. Thanks!Luminum (talk) 19:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

User:63.134.188.237

I notified User:63.134.188.237 of the three revert rule and that he will be reported to an administrator if he makes another one of these edits. Since you have reverted the majority of the edits that he has made, I thought that you should know of the warning he has received. Hope that makes sense, WM2 19:09, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

STOP DELETING THE "CLONING IN FICTION" CATEGORY ON THE TSUBSA RESEVIOR CHRONICLE

It's about cloning so I added it to the page. I've got two warnings and I almost got banned because you keep removing it and flagging my userpage. STOP IT!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.134.188.237 (talk) 23:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

None of the edits had a edit summary to explain such things. Moreover, as Wikimichael22 and me noted, cloning is not prominent theme in Tsubasa with only two notable clones existing and being more prominent themes in the series such as romance or magic. Besides, the clones could be a subtopic of magic as they were created by a sorcerer.Tintor2 (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Nice Comeback.

Thanks for adding a reliable statement this time. I really apreciate this edit. I reworded it partially so that it would make more sense, nothing else. Still, I really am looking forward to reading this new "Dragon Ball SD" manga. Thanks! 72.197.241.2 (talk) 00:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Do I need to remind you that I actually never added anything to the article?Tintor2 (talk) 01:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 9)

I pointed this out on the talk page for season 8; this page has a note that specifically says that it's the last volume of the "season 8" DVD set. Geg (talk) 23:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello

Hi Tintor2, hope you're well. As an editor who has used the services of the Guild of Copy Editors, I thought you might be interested in knowing that the Guild is currently holding elections for its coordinators. To view the discussion and voice your opinion, please visit the election page. Thanks! Lunalet (talk) 10:36, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Guidelines

Alright I have made a new post here,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga/Bleach#Guidelines_Revision, is that fine with you?--150.212.72.23 (talk) 18:37, 8 December 2010 (UTC)