User talk:Mpcpro

Welcome!

Hello, Mpcpro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ralph Cupper, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 04:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ralph Cupper

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ralph Cupper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 04:39, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Hello there, I am going to delete this article I'm afraid because it doesn't claim any of the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO. If any of these criteria can be met with reliable sources to back the claim up, then the article can be reinstated of course. Please message me here if you need any help with this. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 09:12, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

If you see here: http://home.online.no/~iahaugen/cdralph&inge2.html the CD: White cliffs of dover has been reviewed by 5 Norwegian Newspapers in West Norway, and if you contact any of those newspapers they will say the CD legit. So he can then claim some of the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO. It says there it only needs one, and since making CDs and being published about it in newspapers is one of them, you should reinstate this topic.