Jump to content

User talk:Dr.K.: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Free Dacians: replied
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<center>[[File:Juletræet.jpg]]</center>
<center>[[File:Juletræet.jpg]]</center>



*Ahem* Don't mess with my work. K thanx bye! [[Special:Contributions/68.162.211.170|68.162.211.170]] ([[User talk:68.162.211.170|talk]])
== Free Dacians ==
== Free Dacians ==
Hi and Happy New Year! I noticed your mass revert for the contributions of ''79.116.211.230'' to [[Free Dacians]] article. Too bad he didn't sign in as a user... I reviewed the changes and noticed bad spellings and issues, but there were some pertinent sections there. Could you please explain the rationale? Thanks. I am running the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Dacia]]. If you have an interest in the topic, please join.--[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 19:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi and Happy New Year! I noticed your mass revert for the contributions of ''79.116.211.230'' to [[Free Dacians]] article. Too bad he didn't sign in as a user... I reviewed the changes and noticed bad spellings and issues, but there were some pertinent sections there. Could you please explain the rationale? Thanks. I am running the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Dacia]]. If you have an interest in the topic, please join.--[[User:Codrinb|Codrin.B]] ([[User talk:Codrinb|talk]]) 19:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:55, 3 January 2011


Free Dacians

Hi and Happy New Year! I noticed your mass revert for the contributions of 79.116.211.230 to Free Dacians article. Too bad he didn't sign in as a user... I reviewed the changes and noticed bad spellings and issues, but there were some pertinent sections there. Could you please explain the rationale? Thanks. I am running the Wikipedia:WikiProject Dacia. If you have an interest in the topic, please join.--Codrin.B (talk) 19:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for the good wishes. The same to you. My rationale is on my edit summary: Bad spelling, broken links, blanking not a good mixture make. Reverting If that is not enough, sorry, I cannot add any more points to this rationale. However if you feel that this is a good edit please feel free to restore it. I am as far removed from Dacian issues as can be imagined so really I do not care/mind. Thank you. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 19:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]