Talk:Triangular routing: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Adding references: new section |
→More needed to add: new section |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Here's a good site if anybody wants to add some references: [http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/~smedidi/Mipv6.ppt http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/~smedidi/Mipv6.ppt] [[User:Kevin chen2003|Kevin chen2003]] ([[User talk:Kevin chen2003|talk]]) 23:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
Here's a good site if anybody wants to add some references: [http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/~smedidi/Mipv6.ppt http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/~smedidi/Mipv6.ppt] [[User:Kevin chen2003|Kevin chen2003]] ([[User talk:Kevin chen2003|talk]]) 23:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC) |
||
== More needed to add == |
|||
I do not know more about Mobile IPv6, but i guess, it will still use proxy, but destination site will somehow recive some special kind of packets which will make this site send packets directly to mobile device. (it obviously introduce some state, but sending site already have state, for example TCP socket). Is this right? |
|||
Also I think that triangular routing will introduce big problems to statefull firewalling on proxy server, proxy will see only traffic in one dirrection. |
Revision as of 20:24, 22 January 2011
Computing Stub‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Adding references
Here's a good site if anybody wants to add some references: http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/~smedidi/Mipv6.ppt Kevin chen2003 (talk) 23:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
More needed to add
I do not know more about Mobile IPv6, but i guess, it will still use proxy, but destination site will somehow recive some special kind of packets which will make this site send packets directly to mobile device. (it obviously introduce some state, but sending site already have state, for example TCP socket). Is this right?
Also I think that triangular routing will introduce big problems to statefull firewalling on proxy server, proxy will see only traffic in one dirrection.