User talk:Dusti (usurped 2): Difference between revisions
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:Dusti/Archive 6. (BOT) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
== Re: |
== Re: Regent Motors, Morecambe == |
||
I am not very happy with you for deleting my wiki article of Regent Motors, Morecambe. I am new to wikipedia and have offered to help create new articles and edit existing ones. The article I created and YOU deleted had valid sources and references and all its content was true. Please get that article back up because I don't know how to do it and you do! |
|||
See [[Talk:Lost (TV series)/Archive 10#Character table]] and other archived discussions. There have been instances where tables have been added, but they are generally unnecessary, especially considering the [[Characters of Lost]] article. -- [[User:Wikipedical|Wikipedical]] ([[User talk:Wikipedical|talk]]) 20:20, 29 January 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation R.E.L.P]] == |
== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation R.E.L.P]] == |
||
Revision as of 20:47, 1 February 2011
 | This user has asked for Wikipedians to give him/her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on his/her edits at Wikipedia:Editor review/Dusti2. |
 | If you're coming to me to be your Mentor for the Ambassadors Program, please note that I am unable to add any Mentee's to my current load. I do encourage you to seek these other highly capable individuals. I will, however, answer general questions if your current Mentor is not immediately available. Good luck this semester, and let's build Wikipedia! --Dusti |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
| (Manual archive list) |
Re: Regent Motors, Morecambe
I am not very happy with you for deleting my wiki article of Regent Motors, Morecambe. I am new to wikipedia and have offered to help create new articles and edit existing ones. The article I created and YOU deleted had valid sources and references and all its content was true. Please get that article back up because I don't know how to do it and you do!
I see you have relisted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation R.E.L.P. Can you help me understand why? Thanks... ttonyb (talk) 05:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- With only two comments, I don't feel that there was enough discussion on the AFD, as I personally like to see more discussion. It never hurts to ask for more opinions on a matter, especially when it comes to deleting an article. Dusti*poke* 06:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you from Qui Tam Relatir
Thank you Dusti for your support of Roland Gibeault. A great source for Gibeault is, http://rolandgibeault.googlepages.com you can also see is info on googlesites as "Roland Gibeault a Relators story" he is one of the most important whistleblower stopping any further fraud from occurring during the 1980's and 1990's regarding the HARM Missile production on false testing of the Altimeter and saved countless military and civilian life and hundreds of millions of dollars of future fraud. Thank you for your ear and your patience166.205.138.74 (talk) 07:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi. The Punjab Juvenile Justice System Rules 2002 hereinafter referred to as the Rules have been made by the Government of the Punjab, Pakistan in 2002, for protection of juveniles in conflict with the law. The article does not include the original text or any copyrighted material of these Rules that may make this article a candidate for deletion. The article can be expanded by including (e.g.) material about the following:
- What change these Rules have brought about regarding treatment of juvenile delinquents as compared with the adults?
- What are the shortcomings of these Rules?
- What are the international instruments involved e.g. United Nations' conventions on the juvenile justice?
- Comparision of these Rules with similar statutes of other developing and developed countries?
- Have these Rules proved to be helpful to convince the law enforcers to go for Restorative Justice instead of Retributive Justice in case of Juveniles?
- Implementation issues?
- Etc., etc.,
For the above reasons, this article shall not be deleted and indeed expanded in scholarly manner.--182.177.145.81 (talk) 16:22, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
216.164.128.152
Hi Dusti,
To let you know, I disagree with your warning to 216.164.128.152.
I found 216.164.128.152's change to be consistent with another article, The Show Must Go, and with a source, Hedley Hoping Third Time's A Charm (: so I've reverted your reversion. :)