Talk:Young Life: Difference between revisions
m →Conflicting statements: - signing |
Cult? |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
How can it be non-denominational while still 'encouraging the exploration of the Christian faith'? - [[User:Greb|Greb]] 05:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC) |
How can it be non-denominational while still 'encouraging the exploration of the Christian faith'? - [[User:Greb|Greb]] 05:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Cult? == |
|||
Is there any evidence that Young Life is somewhat like a cult? |
|||
Revision as of 00:48, 26 February 2006
POV
User 143.109.59.20 has added a large amount of content that appears to be promotional. Given the obvious POV problems with promotional material, I will remove it soon.
Concurr. Ditch that.
I also found this article to be biased. I cited this line in the introduction as evidence. Young Life tries to make a subtle distinction from our high school ministry.
What is it biased towards? It seemed pretty straightforward and informational to me.
Conflicting statements
Does anyone else see a problem with this statement:
Young Life, which began in 1941 (although in Britain, NYLC began in 1911), is a non-profit non-denominational organization founded by Jim Rayburn. Young Life's focus is on teenagers. Kids are encouraged to explore the purpose of life and the Christian faith through weekly clubs
How can it be non-denominational while still 'encouraging the exploration of the Christian faith'? - Greb 05:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Cult?
Is there any evidence that Young Life is somewhat like a cult?