Talk:Visual Component Library: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:02, 7 February 2011

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

What's it all about?

Is there anything visual about the VCL? Are any components noteworthy enough to be discussed on Wikipedia? Is the VCL one library, and if so, is it finished? Is there a catalog for it? D021317c 23:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VCL contains all the basic UI classes - things like forms, buttons, listboxes, etc. Barry Kelly (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TObject

Presently, the article states that: "The VCL forms an object hierarchy where all other objects inherit or indirectly inherit the TObject class" Is this actually true? I always thought that TObject is the root class in object model of Component Pascal, and VCL is a separate library which builds on that, with TComponent being its root class. -- int19h (talk) 11:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The VCL is part of Delphi, aka Object Pascal. It's not Component Pascal. The root of Delphi's inheritance hierarchy is indeed TObject. Barry Kelly (talk) 17:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The vcl though has its own rootclass: Tcomponent which indeed is derived of Tobject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.84.219.105 (talk) 19:52, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

.NET Modeled after VCL

The last claim on this page seems extremely dubious to me, I don't know where it came from, I'd like to see a reference. .NET is much closer to java than VCL, but correct me if I"m wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by D2brothe (talk • contribs) 18:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC) Think of Winforms and Anders Heijlsberg.[reply]

Revision as of 19:54, 5 May 2009 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,553,330 edits m Signing comment by 84.84.219.105 - "→TObject: " ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:02, 7 February 2011 edit undo 62.159.30.170 (talk) →.NET Modeled after VCL Next edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	The last claim on this page seems extremely dubious to me, I don't know where it came from, I'd like to see a reference. .NET is much closer to java than VCL, but correct me if I"m wrong. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:D2brothe\|D2brothe]] ([[User talk:D2brothe\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/D2brothe\|contribs]]) 18:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		The last claim on this page seems extremely dubious to me, I don't know where it came from, I'd like to see a reference. .NET is much closer to java than VCL, but correct me if I"m wrong. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:D2brothe\|D2brothe]] ([[User talk:D2brothe\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/D2brothe\|contribs]]) 18:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			Think of Winforms and Anders Heijlsberg.