User talk:AryconVyper

Thank you to whoever thought that the article needed speedy deletion, without bothering to allow me time to clean up the article and improve it to meet guidelines. It was an article UNDER CONSTRUCTION, not a stub for spam promotion. AryconVyper (talk) 14:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Notability (web) and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest before trying to recreate an article on your website. Unless you can show that such an article meets the criteria of those guidelines, an article about the web site is likely to be deleted again if it is recreated. -- Donald Albury 14:56, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

I understand the guidelines are meant to avoid crap articles; I also understand that I made a mistake by not constructing the article first in my sandbox. What I'm not happy about is that no one involved in marking or deleting the article suggested it at the time. There is no conflict of interest here, as this is not my website. I live in the area and found the website, and thought it would be fun to write an article on them, since my hobby is writing. I obviously have a lot to learn about how new contributors are treated on Wikipedia. I've been on Wikipedia for years as an anonymous editor, fighting spam and inaccurate information, and I know your intentions are well-placed, but next time a new user creates an article in the wrong place, consider having it moved to their own page first. AryconVyper (talk) 15:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)