Talk:East London, South Africa: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Answer to question |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
No Bisho is not part of East London, however both settlements are in [[Buffalo City]] and are part of the same municpality. Quite a bit of development on precisely how South African local government is structured should be put up. I am attempting to get the process underway: |
No Bisho is not part of East London, however both settlements are in [[Buffalo City]] and are part of the same municpality. Quite a bit of development on precisely how South African local government is structured should be put up. I am attempting to get the process underway: |
||
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=South_African_Municipalities |
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=South_African_Municipalities |
||
East London and Bisho have entirely different municipalities. Bisho is not part of Buffalo City. |
|||
There is also an error in this article. The Xhosa for East London is Emonti, Not Imonti. The E- prefix indicates a place, whereas I- indicates an object. |
|||
Revision as of 05:40, 2 March 2006
Is Bisho really part of Buffalo City? I can't see any reference to this elsewhere... Nyh 09:16, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC) No Bisho is not part of East London, however both settlements are in Buffalo City and are part of the same municpality. Quite a bit of development on precisely how South African local government is structured should be put up. I am attempting to get the process underway: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=South_African_Municipalities
East London and Bisho have entirely different municipalities. Bisho is not part of Buffalo City.
There is also an error in this article. The Xhosa for East London is Emonti, Not Imonti. The E- prefix indicates a place, whereas I- indicates an object.