Jump to content

User:Apagogeron: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Apagogeron (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Apagogeron (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
My concern is that many of the incredibly ignorant misrepresentations of astrology and the irrational vehemence against it that one can find online and in the media are traceable to the Wikipedia article on astrology. Often pieces from the article are copied verbatim. It does not help that this heavily biased POV stems from the attitudes of science leaders who haven't studied astrology and have no inkling of what they are talking about.
My concern is that many of the incredibly ignorant misrepresentations of astrology and the irrational vehemence against it that one can find online and in the media are traceable to the Wikipedia article on astrology. Often pieces from the article are copied verbatim. It does not help that this heavily biased POV stems from the attitudes of science leaders who haven't studied astrology and have no inkling of what they are talking about, yet do not hesitate to abuse their personal authority, which they would never do in their own fields of knowledge.

Revision as of 02:36, 19 March 2011

My concern is that many of the incredibly ignorant misrepresentations of astrology and the irrational vehemence against it that one can find online and in the media are traceable to the Wikipedia article on astrology. Often pieces from the article are copied verbatim. It does not help that this heavily biased POV stems from the attitudes of science leaders who haven't studied astrology and have no inkling of what they are talking about, yet do not hesitate to abuse their personal authority, which they would never do in their own fields of knowledge.