Talk:Opera 10: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:19, 20 March 2011

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computing.

speedy deletion

Opera 10 has been released where? There's no press release, they're only offering 9.64 to download, and their next still talks about a release candidate. Q ^{T C} 02:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the speedy deletion for the following reasons:

The reason cited in the tag is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion.
It is clearly not an uncontroversial deletion as required for all speedy deletions, especially those not fitting a specific criteria. Redirects for discussion is a more proper forum.
The redirect can be easily converted into a proper article if and when there are reliable sources to base a proper article on.
The remark "Opera wants to publish an Opera 10 article " smacks of a conflict of interest. We don't do things just because corporations want them done.
Beeblebrox (talk) 02:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Best and Worst Browsers

The pie chart in the article shows browsers in order of popularity as follows:

IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, and "Other".

The order of popularity is clearly just about the opposite of the order of quality.

I wonder just what browsers fall into the "other" category. Judging from their lack of popularity, one could surmise that they must be really, really good!

Dagme (talk) 04:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Konquerer, Firefox Minefield (nighlies), Flock, Avant, Lynx, Netscape Navigator, SeaMonkey and Camino are just some of them Anish9807 (talk) 09:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have got to be kidding me, right? less popular DOES NOT mean higher quality. With that reasoning we would assume that a browser that I created a while ago that only I have ever used is the best browser ever built when in fact it is shit.

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 [[User:Dagme|Dagme]] ([[User talk:Dagme|talk]]) 04:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 :Konquerer, Firefox Minefield (nighlies), Flock, Avant, Lynx, Netscape Navigator, SeaMonkey and Camino are just some of them [[User:Anish9807|Anish9807]] ([[User talk:Anish9807|talk]]) 09:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
+You have got to be kidding me, right? less popular DOES NOT mean higher quality. With that reasoning we would assume that a browser that I created a while ago that only I have ever used is the best browser ever built when in fact it is shit.