Talk:Opera 10: Difference between revisions
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
[[User:Dagme|Dagme]] ([[User talk:Dagme|talk]]) 04:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC) |
[[User:Dagme|Dagme]] ([[User talk:Dagme|talk]]) 04:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
:Konquerer, Firefox Minefield (nighlies), Flock, Avant, Lynx, Netscape Navigator, SeaMonkey and Camino are just some of them [[User:Anish9807|Anish9807]] ([[User talk:Anish9807|talk]]) 09:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
:Konquerer, Firefox Minefield (nighlies), Flock, Avant, Lynx, Netscape Navigator, SeaMonkey and Camino are just some of them [[User:Anish9807|Anish9807]] ([[User talk:Anish9807|talk]]) 09:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC) |
||
You have got to be kidding me, right? less popular DOES NOT mean higher quality. With that reasoning we would assume that a browser that I created a while ago that only I have ever used is the best browser ever built when in fact it is shit. |
Revision as of 00:19, 20 March 2011
Software: Computing Redirect‑class | ||||||||||
|
speedy deletion
Opera 10 has been released where? There's no press release, they're only offering 9.64 to download, and their next still talks about a release candidate. Q T C 02:01, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- I've declined the speedy deletion for the following reasons:
- The reason cited in the tag is not a valid criterion for speedy deletion.
- It is clearly not an uncontroversial deletion as required for all speedy deletions, especially those not fitting a specific criteria. Redirects for discussion is a more proper forum.
- The redirect can be easily converted into a proper article if and when there are reliable sources to base a proper article on.
- The remark "Opera wants to publish an Opera 10 article " smacks of a conflict of interest. We don't do things just because corporations want them done.
- Beeblebrox (talk) 02:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Best and Worst Browsers
The pie chart in the article shows browsers in order of popularity as follows:
IE, Firefox, Chrome, Safari, Opera, and "Other".
The order of popularity is clearly just about the opposite of the order of quality.
I wonder just what browsers fall into the "other" category. Judging from their lack of popularity, one could surmise that they must be really, really good!
Dagme (talk) 04:32, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
- Konquerer, Firefox Minefield (nighlies), Flock, Avant, Lynx, Netscape Navigator, SeaMonkey and Camino are just some of them Anish9807 (talk) 09:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
You have got to be kidding me, right? less popular DOES NOT mean higher quality. With that reasoning we would assume that a browser that I created a while ago that only I have ever used is the best browser ever built when in fact it is shit.