Jump to content

User:Apagogeron: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Apagogeron (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Apagogeron (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
My concern, as a longtime amateur student of astrology, is that many of the incredibly ignorant misrepresentations of astrology and the irrational vehemence against it that one can find online and in the media are traceable to the Wikipedia article on astrology. Often pieces from the article are copied verbatim. It does not help that this heavily biased POV stems from the attitudes of science leaders who haven't studied astrology and have no inkling of what they are talking about, yet do not hesitate to abuse their personal authority, which they would never do in their own fields of knowledge.
I am a longtime amateur student of astrology, concerned that many of the misrepresentations of astrology and the vehemence against it that one can find online and in the media are traceable to the Wikipedia article on astrology. Often pieces from the article are copied verbatim. Astrologers are not well represented among WP editor demographics and this has resulted in a [[Systemic_bias|systemic bias]] against it. Astrology classes are not taught in Western universities. It does not help that this biased POV stems from many science leaders who have no grasp of astrology, yet do not hesitate to make claims against it solely on the weight of their own personal authority. The few scientists who have taken the trouble to understand astrology in theory and in practice and have taken the time to examine the methods that have been used to experimentally test astrology have a very different story to tell and that story is not getting across.

Revision as of 04:01, 21 March 2011

I am a longtime amateur student of astrology, concerned that many of the misrepresentations of astrology and the vehemence against it that one can find online and in the media are traceable to the Wikipedia article on astrology. Often pieces from the article are copied verbatim. Astrologers are not well represented among WP editor demographics and this has resulted in a systemic bias against it. Astrology classes are not taught in Western universities. It does not help that this biased POV stems from many science leaders who have no grasp of astrology, yet do not hesitate to make claims against it solely on the weight of their own personal authority. The few scientists who have taken the trouble to understand astrology in theory and in practice and have taken the time to examine the methods that have been used to experimentally test astrology have a very different story to tell and that story is not getting across.