Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 March 28: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Prosimos: new section |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<!-- ...but don't type after this line! |
<!-- ...but don't type after this line! |
||
Your signature has already been added! -->[[User:BiggKhrisco|BiggKhrisco]] ([[User talk:BiggKhrisco|talk]]) 06:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC) |
Your signature has already been added! -->[[User:BiggKhrisco|BiggKhrisco]] ([[User talk:BiggKhrisco|talk]]) 06:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
== [[Prosimos]] == |
|||
<!-- Type your question or comment under this line... --> |
|||
What do you think about the type of information given on the project? does it provides too many information or does it lack something? |
|||
<!-- ...but don't type after this line! |
|||
Your signature has already been added! -->[[User:RGimenez|RGimenez]] ([[User talk:RGimenez|talk]]) 14:00, 28 March 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:00, 28 March 2011
Bungeegal23 (talk) 02:09, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Seems like a fun book, but review Wikipedia:Notability (books) and make sure you can document its notability. If you proceed, you need inline references to third party information. I put a sample reference in your article to show you how to do this correctly. Use the Cite web template at Wikipedia:Citation templates. The system will create the footnote list for you, once you record the reference material properly. The book's site must be an External link. I fixed this for you. Don't worry about categories until later. I hope you don't mind that I rewrote the first sentence a bit too... Tkotc (talk) 06:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
I just need for this article to be reviewed so it can be added to the site.
BiggKhrisco (talk) 06:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
What do you think about the type of information given on the project? does it provides too many information or does it lack something?