Talk:Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2002)

Progress so far

Hey! You've got a good start going with this. If it expands a little more in the next few days, it should be eligible for appearing on the "Did You Know" section of Wikipedia's main page. One thing I notice early is that it seems to be largely based on primary sources. Looking into news coverage of this case will probably help establish more context. Keep up the good work!--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Here is what Obar emailed us. The bolded items were the ones that I changed

|Litigants=Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton Argue Date= Wednesday, October 10, 2001 Decide Date= Monday, May 13, 2002 |USVol=413 |USPage=49 |Citation= |Prior= |Subsequent= |Holding=A civil injunction barring the theatres in question from showing adult films was upheld, however the State's definitions of obscene material must be re-evaluated in light of recent jurisprudence. |SCOTUS=1972-1975 Majority= Souter |JoinMajority= Ginsburg, Rehnquist, Stevens and Thomas |Dissent= Breyer |Join Dissent= Scalia

Brittany Balbaugh (talk) 06:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)