Jump to content

User talk:Gazpr: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


==Discussion==
==Discussion==
=== Viktor Bout ===
===Your addition to the Peoples uni of russia===
These claims are quite controversial and were removed by russavia, please follow [[WP:BRD]] and move to discussion, thanks. This is also not imo a [[WP:RS]] [http://www.iranterror.com http://www.iranterror.com] I suggest if you disagree with that you could ask at the [[WP:RSN]] and see what other users think, regards. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 10:43, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
:Any source about the university mentions it. You can take [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/42244.stm BBC] ("a notorious hotbed for recruiting foreign communists to the Soviet Union"), New York Times ("terrorism, sabotage..."), Encyclopedia of Terrorism, or any other source I have provided. [[User:Gazpr|Gazpr]] ([[User talk:Gazpr#top|talk]]) 10:49, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
::A hotbed for recruiting foreign communist...well it is a Moscow university so what would you expect, all universities s would fit into that group and a hot bed for that is different from accusing it of being a KGB training camp, anyways, the talkpage awaits, please provide evidence of mainstream commentary supporting your claims, thanks. [[User:Off2riorob|Off2riorob]] ([[User talk:Off2riorob|talk]]) 10:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Russian influence operations in Austria]]==
[[Image:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|48px|]]

The article [[Russian influence operations in Austria]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]  because of the following concern:
:'''The article as written is classic [[WP:COATRACK]] material. It presents information on Gazprom business in Austria, and attempts to portray this as "Russian influence operations". There are other issues such as [[WP:SYN]], [[WP:OR]] and the like which are still unresolved after a month, and given that there is also potential [[WP:BLP]] violating material in the article, it is best that this be deleted and if the article creator wants to start again, he should do so with [[WP:NPOV]] in mind.'''

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Russian influence operations in Austria|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing <code>{{tl|dated prod}}</code> will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. The [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion process]] can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:PRODWarning --> [[User:Russavia|Russavia]] <sup>[[User talk:Russavia|I'm chanting as we speak]]</sup> 03:03, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


== [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|Articles for deletion]] nomination of [[:SPAG]] ==

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|42px]]</div>I have nominated [[SPAG]], an article that you created, for [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deletion]]. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SPAG]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.{{-}}Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. <!-- Template:AFDWarning --> [[User:EyeSerene|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#4B0082">EyeSerene</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:EyeSerene|<span style="color:#6B8E23">talk</span>]]</sup> 09:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

== Viktor Bout ==


Sorry to tell you I reverted your edits to the [[Viktor Bout]] page. I want you to contribute to this page, but I reverted your edit because you deleted cited material.
Sorry to tell you I reverted your edits to the [[Viktor Bout]] page. I want you to contribute to this page, but I reverted your edit because you deleted cited material.
Line 33: Line 11:


::I replaced the lead section and added more sections. I do appreciate you edits! They really improved the page. I replaced the lead because I wasn't sure why you removed the information to "Other". I think it's better placed in the lead, but I am open to discussion. Let me know if you're agreeable, and thanks again for improving the article. [[User:Fleetham|Fleetham]] ([[User talk:Fleetham|talk]]) 20:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
::I replaced the lead section and added more sections. I do appreciate you edits! They really improved the page. I replaced the lead because I wasn't sure why you removed the information to "Other". I think it's better placed in the lead, but I am open to discussion. Let me know if you're agreeable, and thanks again for improving the article. [[User:Fleetham|Fleetham]] ([[User talk:Fleetham|talk]]) 20:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

:::Looks good. --[[User:Gazpr|Gazpr]] ([[User talk:Gazpr#top|talk]]) 20:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:11, 3 April 2011

Contact me

My cookies.

You can contact me by email.

Discussion

Viktor Bout

Sorry to tell you I reverted your edits to the Viktor Bout page. I want you to contribute to this page, but I reverted your edit because you deleted cited material.

Besides the deletion of cited material, I feel your contribution was very helpful! Let's discuss improving the page without deleting cited material, ok? Fleetham (talk) 17:33, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the lead section and added more sections. I do appreciate you edits! They really improved the page. I replaced the lead because I wasn't sure why you removed the information to "Other". I think it's better placed in the lead, but I am open to discussion. Let me know if you're agreeable, and thanks again for improving the article. Fleetham (talk) 20:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. --Gazpr (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]